Showing posts with label Labour party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Labour party. Show all posts

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

UK Society Is Less Integrated Than Ever

Image from the Daily Mail

It never ceases to amaze me how politicians and prospective politicians treat voters. 

Yesterday Ed Miliband, quite rightly, was ridiculed for his ‘Tablet of Stone’ circus.  Who is advising that man?  He doesn’t need to be portrayed in such a manner, he does a good enough job of looking rather stupid without props.

Now today we have politicians complaining about the segregation of men and women at a Labour party hustings in Birmingham.  Why the faux shock and horror?  Most people know that the Muslim community do not permit women to have the same freedoms as men and if there’s any criticism I’d make about the above image is that I’m surprised women were present at all.

Many years ago now a young Muslim student befriended me at the college in which I worked. We both lived quite a way out of town and someone had said I may be able to give her a lift home one evening as her brother was unable to do so. She explained in the car that she wouldn’t have been able to accept a lift from a man, although there was a male student who had offered.  This was the start of my education about Islam.

Her family weren’t keen on her being an acquaintance of mine but I think they saw my uses and tolerated it.  Never once was I invited into the home when I collected or dropped her off on the odd occasion no family member was able to provide transport.  She was 18 but her father openly told me she would never learn to drive. He had an older daughter who had learned to drive and now ‘she was beyond my control’.

I was invited to the student’s arranged marriage which took place in a local town hall. That was the only time I met the student’s ‘driving’ sister and we had a pleasant hour or so talking about what life in general.  That room was very much divided - similar to the above photograph - and we sat for 4 hours waiting for the final guests to appear. Their coach had broken down en route from Blackburn which was the groom’s home town.

Having arrived at 1.30pm for a 2pm wedding, I was beginning to feel rather hungry around 5pm but filled myself with water while giant bottles of coke were passed around other guests.  By this time I was aware I was the only white person present in a congregation of around 150.  

The ceremony didn’t appear to take long once it started and by 6.30pm there was an announcement in a language I didn’t understand. ‘Food is ready’ said the prettily dressed woman to my left.  ‘Thank goodness’ I thought, at least I can move from this seat on which I’d been perched for well over 4 hours.  I stood in anticipation of having an interesting supper and felt a tug on my coat. ‘Men go first’ I was told. This was expanded with the information that the women had to wait until the men had eaten.

My reaction?  I hurriedly left and was home within 20 minutes, still reeling from the culture shock.

It was some months later I had a telephone call from the student who asked if I would provide a character reference for a job application. She had moved to Blackburn immediately after her marriage and found the constraints suffocating and wanted to apply for a job.  I sent the reference and didn’t hear more. It was the following year when my doorbell rang and there stood the student with a baby in her arms. She was visiting her parents for the first time since her marriage.  We chatted for quite a while but I was conscious she kept looking at her watch.  

The job?  Her husband and his family refused to allow her to attend the interview and told her there was no need for her to work as she had enough to do looking after the older members of the family and having children.  She wasn’t allowed out without a male member of the family or one of the senior women accompanying her.

Whilst I have no problem with people’s religious beliefs, I’ve often though what a waste of a bright, attractive young woman. Last time I saw her she was deeply unhappy.

So the critics of the above image shouldn’t be surprised at such segregation. What they should be criticising is the fact that a special hustings for Muslims was held, when the same critics are the first to say we are an ‘inclusive society’.  Some sections of society will never integrate with the majority.

This hustings, a public meeting, should have been open to all regardless of colour or religion. That would have been more in keeping with my desire for an open and integrated UK.  Will it happen? I firmly believe the answer is never.


Tuesday, 9 July 2013

The Falkirk Farce


Try as they might to embarrass Alex Salmond's Saltire gesture at Wimbledon on Sunday, Labour could be accused of using the First Minister's genuine delight as a cover for more serious matters.

Falkirk is one and perhaps the tip of an iceberg.  We'll have to wait to see if the police uncover more impropriety, although I doubt it.  I'm not suggesting there aren't Labour constituencies where candidates were approved 'against the rules', but that the police will have difficulty discovering them. Labour are particularly skilled at covering their dubious practices. Think about postal voting and how these have increased dramatically over the years in Labour areas.  Pathetic efforts by the Electoral Commission have revealed nothing but it's generally accepted that there is a good possibility fraud takes place.  Why do we accept it?  Why don't the other parties insist upon an independent investigation?  The only conclusion I can come to is that the current system suits them too.

But Falkirk has opened a can of worms and shown just how Ed Miliband is a weak leader. He gained office only by the grace of the unions and since then these unions - and in particular Len Mc Cluskey's Unite union - have been calling payback time and quietly taking over control of Labour by attempting to ensure their choice is accepted. As Dan Hodges says: "Len McCluskey and his union have been caught bang to rights. No ifs. No buts. No maybes."

Miliband appears to be losing his grip and can't decide which side of the fence to fall on.

Johann Lamont, during her campaign for the leadership of Scottish Labour, was insistent that the new leader had control of the whole of the Scottish Labour party and not just the MSPs.  She hasn't said one word about this on-going saga and that proves what many of us already believe, that Scottish Labour is but a branch of London Labour.

What a farce it all is and surely the people of Falkirk deserve better.


Friday, 30 March 2012

A Political Resurrection


George Galloway has won the Bradford West by-election by more than a 10,000 majority from Labour, on a swing of 36.59%.

Three tweets, which possibly sum up public opinion, caught my attention, but will they catch the eye of Ed Miliband?

Quite probably Ed has convinced himself that it's only the Scottish branch of his party which is in disarray, but this morning he'll have to admit the throughout the whole organisation or face another leadership challenge. His brother's phone will be engaged no doubt. 

If you're interested here is a video in which George Galloway shows a few of his true colours.


Looking at the numbers & the records Galloway's victory in Bradford West is the most sensational by election result of modern times.



George Galloway is the Marmite of politicians. I don't agree with him on many 
issues-eg.his Unionist stance, but I don't doubt his integrity.

Monday, 4 April 2011

I don't ruddy well believe it!

Such Short memories Scots have.


You dumped this cretin and his mates on us poor sods down South,  notwithstanding this awfulness and now I learn you are embracing Gray as though he's your Scottish Messiah. Dwarf Marr couldn't hide the BBC's glee at this resurgence and are salivating over this new renaissance. I now long for Scottish Independence, if only to stop more Snotty like cuckoo activity back down here.

You might hate the Cobbleition as much as I do but I never lose sight of the tingle of joy that Labours' humiliation last May brought. Still if it's what you want then so be it. Just remember how bad they were when unfettered at Westminster!

OldRightie



Friday, 11 February 2011

Posers and Criminals



Yesterday was a good day for some politicians and not for others, as is perhaps usually the case.  While Westminster MPs boasted 'we stood up to Europe' by rejecting the European Court's ruling that prisoners must get the vote, one Labour MP was sentenced to a year's imprisonment for fraud and another found guilty of the same offence.  The only difference was they used slightly diverse styles in their efforts to steal public money.

We all know that yesterday's vote carries no weight and is mere posturing. Until the UK is willing to comply with ECHR's ruling, they will be delighted to relieve us of considerable sums of money, classed as fines.  There's the matter of compensation claims to consider too but that won't worry the believers in the Human Rights Act which David Cameron said he would revise.
  
Disgraced Labour MP, Eric Illsley, was jailed for a year yesterday for fiddling his parliamentary expenses.  The former Labour MP, Jim Devine, was found guilty of making false expense claims at the same court.  He will be sentenced in four weeks.  How the man managed to get anywhere near the House of Commons defeats me but he appears to have worked his way through the labour party system of being 'somebody' in the unions.

A question was posed to me this week.

'Bearing in mind in mind that charges and convictions generally represent only a fraction of criminal activity, it does seem that either:

1  A high proportion of the political class is drawn to crime
                                         or 
2  A high proportion of the criminal class is drawn to politics'

I've yet to give my answer but this blog may be some help for some of you.

Wednesday, 19 January 2011

Taxpayers' Theatre



Yesterday morning I woke early - around 5.30am I think - and noticed a tweet from Mike Smithson about filibustering.  Curious to see the current situation I linked to Democracy Live to find a Labour baroness repeatedly telling her disinterested audience she had visited her old constituency every weekend yet nobody knew she was there, followed by a Scottish Baroness giving the few people present a history lesson about previous incumbents in her constituency, interspersed with a tale about cannibals and other more than strange anecdotes.

None of this was related to their discussion of the voting reform legislation of course, but an attempt to talk out the Bill.

The first record of filibustering was when Cato the Younger at least twice tried to frustrate the political objectives of Julius Caesar.  Watching this briefly in the early morning made me think politics hasn't much changed.

Surely there must be a more democratic and modern method that this expensive theatre. In some ways I sympathise with Labour's desire for the Bill to be split into a Parliamentary Voting System Bill and a Constituencies Bill, but when you discover that hired beds were made available, the Bishops' Bar was open all night and entertainment was accessible and all paid for by us, it's insulting to the general electorate. By all accounts it was more like an all night party than a serious political debate.

The constituencies part of the Bill suggests reducing the number of MPs. Surely it can't be the consequential redrawing of boundaries which upsets them?

A reduction in MPs is long past time and next on the cards should be a Bill proposing a similar reduction in the House of Lords.  Both houses in Westminster require modernised with these affectatious titles top of the list.  The Scottish Parliament has etiquette towards colleagues about right.

source

Friday, 1 October 2010

Double Standards



It's of no interest to me who Ed Miliband lives with in the posh part of London.  But, (yes you knew there would be a but), what does show his character is the fact he was 'too busy' to sign his name on his son's birth certificate.  For a man who is ambitious enough to want to lead this country, that is an appalling lack of judgement.

For some years I've been interested in ancestry.  Hanging around graveyards in pouring rain (it always seems to rain) is a hobby and an intriguing one.  Information I gather is shared with others and we've helped out people from all over the world because we've been able to discover burial places and the odd home or place of business of their ancestors.  Owing to the internet it's so much easier for those wishing to trace their family roots to find the relevant documents to get them started - birth, marriage and death certificates.

Ed Miliband does his family no favours with his casual attitude to his son's existence.  These days more people have no desire to marry and decide to have their children without the official record of their relationship.  Many other birth certificates don't have the father's name recorded.  I know the upset this causes because a member of my own family was born illegitimate in the 1930s and his father's name isn't recorded on his birth certificate and of course there is no marriage certificate.  The fact we can progress no further in the search is sad.

Another small point is that Ed Miliband voted strongly in favour of gay marriages and civil partnerships.  A strange decision from someone who doesn't appear to favour hetrosexual marriage isn't it.

Wednesday, 29 September 2010

The New Shadow Chancellor - according to BB




According to Benedict Brogan, who is perhaps one of the more accurate political forecasters, one name doing the rounds in the Labour party for the post of shadow chancellor is Jim Murphy (pictured).

Mr Brogan describes him as hard-nosed, modern and young (enough).

I'll keep my own adjectives to myself.

Monday, 27 September 2010

No Smoke Without Fire



Mohammad Sarwar (pictured) was MP for Glasgow Central until he stood down at the last election.  In the spirit of true nepotism his son Anas replaced him.

Some time ago Gordon Brown personally recommended a seat in the House of Lords for the former Glasgow Central MP.  However, after consulting with HM Revenue and Customs, the Lords appointments committee initially refused to give the go-ahead to the ennoblement for undisclosed reasons.

This is embarrassing for not only Mr Brown and Mr Sarwar but also for the Labour party.

Mr Sarwar admitted the taxman had highlighted some problems but stressed these had been satisfactorily dealt with.  "Every issue has been resolved so (HMRC) doesn't have any objection to my nomination," he stated and further explained that the tax authority had subsequently written to the commission 'lifting their objections'.

The ex-MP is no stranger to controversy.  Soon after his election in 1997 he was suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party over allegations of bribing political opponents and stood trial for fraud.  He was acquitted.  He is reported to be worth around £16 million and lived like a millionaire when an MP.  His London house was a £600,000 apartment in an exclusive block in Vauxhall, south London, just over the river from the Houses of Parliament.  He claimed almost £2,000 every month for the interest on his mortgage and also claimed more than £3,000 for ground rent and service charges every year as well as around £1,500 for council tax and hundred of pounds for home phone bills that included calls to Pakistan.  His mortgage was paid from a UK branch of the Swiss-based Habib Bank AG Zurich.

His total expenses claim for 2008 was £174,772 but he turned up for only 55% of votes, spoke in only nine debates and asked 55 parliamentary questions.

The 'issues' involving Mr Sarwar's tax must have been serious because the HMRC would not normally cause disruption within the Establishment.  All seems hunky-dory now though and soon we'll be seeing Lord Sarwar of IWouldNeverFiddleMyTaxes - bedecked in ermine - adorning the front pages.

source

Pipped at the Post So What Now?



David Miliband is said to be considering his future this weekend.  His brother Ed, the new leader of the Labour Party, has said he can have any job he fancies in the new shadow government but David hasn't leapt at the opportunity to be shadow chancellor or any other high profile post.  Who would want their younger brother to be their boss?

Miliband Snr must be rueing the days when he had the chance to lead the Labour party because that opportunity has now gone.  Some of his supporters say he should have challenged Gordon Brown in 2007, but he dithered and then decided to let Brown have a free run.  Then there was the day his pal James Purnell quit the cabinet last summer.  Many thought then it was a perfect time for David Miliband to follow suit and, because Brown was hingin' by a tack ( translation: hanging by a nail) at the time, Miliband Snr may well have seized the keys to No 10.  Alas, he dithered once again.

There's rumour abound in the press this weekend that he may serve for a year or so, either in the cabinet of some other capacity, then he'll depart British politics.  Will he start touting his wares around his pals in the EU? Last year some European leaders thought he would be an ideal candidate for the post of EU foreign minister, but he decided against it and Cathy Ashton thought all her Christmases had come at once.  The reason given at the time was that he wanted to lead the Labour party.

Will he perhaps follow in the steps of his mentor, Tony Blair, and decided to look for a position in the US?  Hilary Clinton appeared quite fond of him and she's able to open many doors.

Regardless what I think of the Milibands, I must pay credit to the manner in which Miliband Snr conducted himself on Saturday.  Leading the labour party was his lifelong ambition and now he has to redefine his aims.  Not a bad thing for anyone to do once in a while and in David Miliband's case he can tap into a deep layer of those in high places who may be due him a favour or two.

source

Saturday, 21 August 2010

Will He or Won't He




Will he or won't he defect to labour? A Press Association article published in the Herald today states that Charlie Kennedy was considering defecting to labour.

Nick Clegg said the suggestion he was quitting in protest at the coalition deal was the "silliest of silly-season stories".

However, here in Scotland we're used to Labour issuing press releases which are not substantiated and at times, down right spurious, yet sections of the public believe every word.

Will Charlie defect? For Labour it would be the biggest coup they've had in years. For the libdems the worst as Charles Kennedy is widely regarded by the general public as a 'people person'. Sadly his marriage has broken up recently and rumour has it that his wife just couldn't cope with his drinking habits - very sad because I know what it's like to live with someone you love who has a serious alcohol dependency - yet surely Charlie doesn't want to kick start his life as a single man in the Labour party.

As many will know I'm no supporter of the libdems but Charlie Kennedy is, by far, the best weapon they have. If he didn't have an alcohol problem then he could have led then onto great things but that was not to be. Mind you, that doesn't mean to say he's one of the best politicians that the libdems have had in the past 30 years.

Can someone verify that a Press Release with a copyright logo has not been written by a journalist but just reproduced by a newspaper?


Tuesday, 8 June 2010

Labour Leadership Race




I don't know about you but I've lost what little interest I had in the race for the Labour leadership. Two brothers, Gordon Brown's pal, a left-left winger, a music enthusiast and Britain's first black female MP make up the list so far.

It's quite extraordinary that one of the main issues of the contest has become immigration - the subject which Labour refused to let anyone else discuss. They were right and those who wanted debate were wrong.

But now we have the Miliband brothers, Ed Balls and Andy Burnham all conceding that Labour failed to respond to the public's concern. Ed Balls has even admitted the Labour policy was damaging job prospects of unemployed British workers. I didn't hear a squeak from any of them when reports concluded that the immigration policy of the Blair/Brown years produced only a minimal economic benefit to the country.

Many immigrants were hard-working but with so many young people - estimates say around one million - on benefits and with no jobs, ways should have been found to get them into jobs first.

Andy Burnham says that during the election 'we had our fingers in our ears and our hands over our eyes' where immigration is concerned. Not only immigration Mr Burnham, the economy, and unnecessary wars are another two on a lengthy list.

For four MPs to change their stance so radically on one of the main general election issues shows me their lack of integrity. Thankfully I'm not a member of the Labour party so I don't have to decide who should be the next leader. If I did, the words 'none of the above' spring to mind.


Tuesday, 11 May 2010

Sunday, 9 May 2010

Brown Out



Fellow blogger Jess the Dog is promoting a postcard campaign. Not only that he intended to deliver one to Gordon Brown this morning.

Jess lives within easy travelling distance of North Queensferry, the Browns' Scottish home, where it is said they fled to yesterday and are now returning to London. All seems lost for the man who once was the saviour of the world but his departure from Downing Street won't be a dignified event.

There has been some excellent blogging on the present situation. Two particularly caught my eye, this one and this one. Both bloggers come from differing ends of the political spectrum. Good news from John Redwood this morning. He's advocating 'It's time for us conservative to speak for England'. Suits me fine.

Update: Jess has written a brief account of his visit to Inverkeithing at his place.

Wednesday, 5 May 2010

Education, Education, Education





Remember the calls of 'toff' and 'posh' issued by various labour politicians throughout the campaign and before? The following is a list of labour MPs who had the benefit of a private education. State schooling wasn't good enough for them it seems and many now send their own children to private schools.

Don't forget, labour are the party which insists those in private education are 'the privileged'.
  • Ed Balls (Morley andOutwood)
  • Hugh Bayley (City of York)
  • Hilary Benn (Leeds Central)
  • Bob Blizzard (Waveney)
  • Chris Bryant (Rhondda)
  • Stephen Byers (North Tyneside)
  • Charles Clarke (Norwich South)
  • Ann Clwyd (Cynon Valley)
  • Jim Cousins (Newcastle-upon-Tyne Central)
  • Alistair Darling (Edinburgh South West)
  • Quentin Davies (Grantham and Stamford)
  • Louise Ellman (Liverpool Riverside)
  • Natascha Engel (North EastDerbyshire)
  • Mark Fisher (Stoke-on-Trent Central)
  • Barry Gardiner (Brent North)
  • Linda Gilroy (Plymouth Sutton)
  • Paul Goggins (Wythenshaweand Sale East)
  • Peter Hain (Neath)
  • Patrick Hall (Bedford andKempston)
  • Fabian Hamilton (Leeds North East)
  • Harriet Harman (Camberwelland Peckham)
  • John Healey (Wentworth)
  • Margaret Hodge (Barking)
  • Geoff Hoon (Ashfield)
  • Lindsay Hoyle (Chorley)
  • Tessa Jowell (Dulwich and West Norwood)
  • Sally Keeble (Northampton North)
  • Ruth Kelly (Bolton West)
  • Jim Knight (South Dorset)
  • Ivan Lewis (South Bury)
  • Martin Linton (Battersea)
  • Ian Lucas (Wrexham)
  • Denis MacShane(Rotherham)
  • Fiona Mactaggart (Slough)
  • Judy Mallaber (Amber Valley)
  • John Mann (Bassetlaw)
  • Rob Marris (Wolverhampton South West)
  • Gordon Marsden (Blackpool South)
  • Bob Marshall-Andrews (Medway)
  • Michael Meacher (OldhamWest and Royton)
  • Chris Mole (Ipswich)
  • Julie Morgan (Cardiff North)
  • Doug Naysmith (Bristol North West)
  • Nick Palmer (Broxtowe)
  • Gordon Prentice (Pendle)
  • James Purnell (Stalybridgeand Hyde)
  • Nick Raynsford (Greenwich and Woolwich)
  • Geoffrey Robinson (Coventry North West)
  • Andrew Slaughter (Ealing, Acton and Shepherd's Bush)
  • John Spellar (Warley)
  • Phyllis Starkey (Milton Keynes South West)
  • Howard Stoate (Dartford)
  • Gavin Strang (Edinburgh East)
  • Mark Todd (SouthDerbyshire)
  • Kitty Ussher (Burnley)
  • Keith Vaz (Leicester East)
  • Malcolm Wicks (CroydonNorth)
  • Michael Wills (SwindonNorth)
  • Rosie Winterton (DoncasterCentral)
  • Shaun Woodward (St HelensSouth)
Thanks to Working Class Tory

Friday, 30 April 2010

'That' Elvis Appearance Could Cost £20,000



Remember this rather weird appearance of an Elvis impersonator at a Labour photo call?

Alistair Campbell organised the presence of The Pelvis (aka Mark Wright) at Lodge Park Technology College in Corby, thinking it would boost Gordon Brown's election campaign.

Now Corby borough council is investigating whether the performance at the weekend breached the Licencing Act. The college is not allowed to permit performances of live music before 6pm.

Corby council has contacted the head teacher, Tom Waterworth, to demand an explanation.

Under the Act, Campbell, as organiser, and Waterworth, the licence holder, could face criminal prosecution resulting in six months in prison or a £20,000 fine.

The college was unable to get a Temporary Event Notice authorising the performance of music, as plans to allow last-minute event notices were withdrawn by the Goverment this month.

Ouch!




Wednesday, 28 April 2010

Tweet Extra


Tweet Extra


I know he's young, a Scottish blogger and a labour activist, but I was disappointed to read this on Twitter. Not smart Yousuf - even if you did think it was humorous.


(Tweeted around 13.30pm)





Friday, 23 April 2010

Brown's Bull Exposed


Congratulations to the SNP for being swift off the mark with this one! Of course the MSM have buried it this morning but keep mentioning the deceit. That's what labour do - repeat and repeat whether it's true or false. This is valid because it's the truth.


Thanks to DarkLochnagar

Tuesday, 13 April 2010

Haven't We Been Here Before?




Gordon Brown unveiled a key 'jobs for all' pledge as part of the labour manifesto yesterday. He intends to offer a job to every long-term unemployed person in Britain over the age of 25 who has been unemployed for two years or more and everyone under 25 unemployed for 10 months or more.

If people rejected the job offered they would lose their benefits.

Haven't we been here before? Where are these jobs? Does he intend to create them in the public sector or are they again short-term 'training' places.

It doesn't make sense. What he should be considering is reorganising the benefits system so that people are better off working rather than claiming from the state. Many long-term unemployed have been through the 'training' schemes which provide little skills training. It would be far better for the individuals and the economy if they were given a choice of vocational subjects to study and to reward them upon results. Removing benefits such as housing allowance will be no advantage to anyone.

I really shouldn't be concerned about this. It will never happen. It's another non-policy from labour.

Caption Please





For those of you who don't know the person in the photograph it is Labour MP Jim Murphy, whose other title is Scottish Secretary.

My contribution is 'Remember when the Home Office lost a memory stick with the details of 84,000 prisoners in England and Wales? Found it! Only Labour can deliver.'

Related Posts with Thumbnails