Saturday, 7 August 2010

Cameron Shrinks in India


The Queen inspecting the 1st Battalion Cameronians
at Holyrood 1950/60s


I watched David Cameron inspecting the Guard of Honour during his visit to India and found his performance disappointing. He looked extremely uncomfortable; as if he wished he was anywhere but there. Possibly that's not too far from the truth. He appeared to shrink in stature as he attempted to refrain from making a run for it. (I've tried hard to find a video clip with David Cameron inspecting the guard of honour in India but no news outlets have one).

'It really is time to give politicians some basic training in the courtesies of such inspections'. Indeed it is. The suggestion that HRH, Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh could lead the training is excellent. It could turn out to be a nice wee earner for Her Majesty's purse too. HRH Training Ltd has a pleasant ring to it don't you think?

As part of the training from royalty, a few 6am's on the parade ground at Catterick should be included in the induction. Just as a warm up. I'm sure HM Forces will be too happy to help out HRH in her project. Our politicians need to learn how to walk the walk as well as talk the talk and do the walking with some dignity.


Tweet Extra


Tweet Extra


dbudlov what does "too big to fail" really mean? it means "too lucrative to the government compared to the now poor/homeless people" #corporatism

Free Electricity



Yes, I do mean free, or at least up to 40% of your usage could be free.

Daniel Green of the home energy company HomeSun will soon start giving away the first of 100,000 solar power systems to anyone with a decent sized south facing roof. He intends to roll out his offer over three years. HomeSun will install and maintain your free system for a period of 25 years.

Mr Green was also on Radio 4 this week explaining his reasons for such an offer. Energy companies are now compelled, for the next 25 years, to make payments to homeowners for all solar power produced. That's both power used in the home and any surpluses. Under HomeSun's scheme customers get to keep all the solar power they need, free of charge and the fees received from the energy companies - known as Feed-in Tariffs - go directly to HomeSun.

"I'm not a charity and I haven't become a tree-hugger. However, I do think we're mad not to make more use of such a great natural and free resource as the sun." My translation: "This will be a great wee earner. Electricity providers will up the costs to the consumer to cover their own costs of the Feed-in Tariffs and I cream off my share of this government-backed incentive scheme. The only losers are the consumers who won't, for various reasons, be eligible for my system."

To qualify for Mr Green's 'badge of honour' offer you require to have a south, south-east or south-west facing roof where there's no shade from trees or neighbouring building. Just a small amount of shade from trees can cut the efficiency by 50% and if your home faces north, forget it.

A very innovative person is Daniel Green and I suspect his exasperated ex-headmaster, who told him he'd never amount to much and then expelled him from his grammer school, is feeling a wee bit discombobulated this morning - if he's still alive.

All this reminds me I never had a response from the company which was determined to sell me solar panels. Maybe I asked too many questions.

Friday, 6 August 2010

Lessons Are Never Learned



Bear with me on this one please.

These three children are dead. They were found in an Edinburgh flat on Wednesday and their mother is said to have jumped from a balcony and sustained serious injuries.

Their parents, Theresa and Pasquale Riggi (both American). were involved in a bitter divorce battle and their mother was due to attend court on Tuesday for a hearing regarding the case. She didn't attend.

The mother and the children went missing on 4 July from the family home at Skene near Aberdeen. The husband had moved out of the house and was staying at a flat in Aberdeen. He didn't find out until 11 July that his wife and the children had left and called police to report them missing. Ports and airports were alerted in case the mother tried to leave the country with the children. Grampian police issued a missing persons appeal on 16 July.

Then, on 21 July, Lothian and Borders officers traced the mother and the children to the flat in Slateford Road, Edinburgh where Wednesday's tragedy unfolded. At that point, it was a simple missing persons inquiry. A police spokesman said: "Officers attended the address and found the family safe and well on 21 July."

That's what is known until last Tuesday, when at the Court, after the husband had spoken to his wife by phone, his lawyer told Lady Clark, who was the judge at the hearing, that Mr Riggi had concerns about his children. Mr Riggi's lawyer said there was a real emergency and Lady Clark obviously concurred with his statement. She asked court officials to find the children and said social workers should supervise them. She also stated that the social workers should apply to a local sheriff for child protection orders if they felt they were necessary.

That was Tuesday.

Edinburgh City Council said their social workers had no reason to get involved with the family before Lady Clark made her order. They said in a statement: "We received a phone call yesterday afternoon (I suspect that was Tuesday although the article is not clear) from lawyers regarding the court proceedings involving the family.

"The court's ruling was then faxed through to us at 15.05. Was this on the Tuesday or Wednesday? "In this fax we were asked to assist with the family's situation if and when they were found by the messenger at arms representing the court." By that time it was too late.

The police knew where the mother and children were yet they weren't informed of the court order.

What has gone wrong with the communication between these agencies who are supposed to protect us? Why are courts using a fax system for information when there are so many systems available these days and yet a phone call didn't seem important? Taxpayers spend billions on services such as justice, police and social workers. Government appears to have personal details on each and every one of us.

We hear so much verbosity from these agencies about how they communicate and will 'learn lessons'. I've no wish to attribute blame to anyone, yet it's deeply concerning that a phone call and a fax to the local council appears to be enough for these agencies to will no doubt, eventually, blame each other.

I can remember the days when police knew everything and we didn't have social workers - or not those who are called social workers these days. These were the days when home schooling had never been heard of, yet this mother insisted her children were home school and the father protested. These were the days when a court order was acted upon immediately by the police. But now it appears it has to initially go to the local council. Why? I suspect some left-thinking labour politician here in Scotland thought up a reason which the courts lapped up.

Surely, if children don't attend school the relevant social work authority should be on red alert? Then again, none of our regular services seems to come under the regulations set for the military. Why can't lessons be learnt? Because our law enforcers are charged with teaching them.

Update: I have been accused of denigrating home education (see comments). My use of the words 'red alert' regarding social work authorities was in connection with this particular case when allegedly the children and their mother had earlier become listed as missing persons. It's my opinion that social work too should have been informed they were missing regardless of whether they were state educated, privately educated or home educated. Also I was not aware the law had been changed regarding home education. I know years ago home educators and the children were monitored on a regular basis - usually to provide the parent with updates from educational developments which they may have missed. There was no internet in those days.

This post is not about home education, it's about the agencies involved in this case and their procedures which were totally inadequate. There's no excuse in today's society for this inefficiency. I can hear the relevant agencies saying 'lessons will be learned'. They never are.


Calling All Wine Lovers



Well, ideally wine lovers who speak French and are able to lift and move cases of wine need only apply.

Other qualifications are required and there's no salary mentioned, but no doubt there will be no shortage of applicants either.

Further details and contact information is here. Good luck!

Police or Thugs?



Robert Whatley, 70, was pulled over in his Range Rover for driving without a seat belt as he drove on a country road in Wales. It's alleged officers tried to issue him with a fixed penalty notice but Mr Whatley drove off.

Two of Gwent's 'finest' followed him along 8 miles of country lanes for 17 minutes before trying to stop the £60,000 Range Rover with a stinger device. At no time did he drive above 40mph. Mr Whatley stopped and you can see the actions of the police here. His lawyer has released this video. (Sorry somehow can't embed it).

Mr Whatley, who has heart problems, was charged with several motoring offences and was found guilty of not wearing a seatbelt, failing to stop for a police officer and having tinted windows which did not conform to legal requirements but cleared of failing to stop after an accident. He also admitted having a registration plate which did not adhere to regulations. The pensioner was fined a total of £235 and ordered to pay £300 towards prosecution costs.

£300 towards prosecution costs after this man's ordeal at the hands of these thugs? The police should be compensating Mr Whatley for the expensive damage done to his vehicle and the trauma he must have suffered with one policeman smashing his side window while another stood on his bonnet and kicked in his windscreen.

The police concerned should be dismissed from the service in disgrace. They have no right to call themselves police. They're thugs.


Thursday, 5 August 2010

A Guest Post from Jim Baxter




The news that the assertively atheistic and self-styled contrarian Christopher Hitchens (pictured) has oesophageal cancer will especially sadden all who admire his insight, wit, and courageous, well-founded contempt for criminals and hypocrites however powerful or admired by the gullible. It can come as no surprise that there are those calling themselves ‘religious’ who see in his illness as a punishment from God. Some of the stench of their pus can be smelled here.


Luckily, for relief from such trash we have the secular press. There will be no irrelevant, tendentious comment there. A report in the Guardian has this to say:


‘The author and polemicist Christopher Hitchens yesterday announced he was cutting short a promotional book tour in order to undergo chemotherapy treatment.

There were reports that the the British-born writer, who was a heavy smoker until giving up several years ago, had been diagnosed with cancer.’


Or there’s this.


Get the picture? Good old ‘Hitch’. Great guy, brave, erudite are just not the words. He’d wipe the floor with most of us (in his day) in any argument, or in any smoking and drinking contest. But there’s just that little flaw in his nature you see that made him, for all his gifts, just that little bit, well, ‘smaller’ , somehow less grown-up, than the rest of us who look can at least look after ourselves a bit better. Oh, of course, there are many causes of cancer but when it’s as obvious as this eh? It’s sad of course but what’s sadder is that he kept ‘hurting’ himself all those years when he knew better. It’s tough but it’s no surprise is it? I’ll bet you Hitch himself would be the first to admit...


Those of us who are not heavy smokers and drinkers can rest a little easier now because there’s another message there for us if we want it, isn’t there? Bad things don’t happen to people who are ‘good’. Hardly ever. And there’s one more – we’ve got him now. Finally we can talk down to him.


Jim Baxter


SR Goes Posh



No, not this blog - I'm far too scared I lose everything if I attempt a new design - but the Scottish Review. It's had a rather posh facelift and most pleasant it is too.

There is also a new satirical column from The Midgie. I hope Kenneth Roy doesn't object to me cutting and pasting a small piece from today's edition.

The Midgie

As many as 17 children in Scotland are believed to have failed their Highers, according to statistics issued today by the Scottish Qualifications (For All) Authority. This represents a disturbing 0.036% of the pupils who sat the accursed paper. All 17 have been informed by standard text: CU U flopped U eejit lol The education secretary, Michael Russell, known to his pals as Mike, is expected to announce a public inquiry into what he called the 'unacceptably high' failure rate. The Midgie understands that the 17 are receiving counselling. Further sanctions are likely, including an in-depth interview by Jackie Bird. lol.


More from The Midgie can be read here
If you'd like to support the SR and/or receive it, completely free, three times a week in your inbox, you can do so here.

Equality Gaza Style



This is a still from a video Not A Sheep published about life in Gaza. Regularly I hear Muslim women say there are no problems concerning equality in their lives. Mind you, in some ways they could be right. Who would you bet on as a future skin cancer patient?

Blundering Peacock Strutts His Stuff



Most of you will realise the customer group of the magazine Bunkered. In the current edition Alex Salmond gave an interview in which he said ministers would be promoting the local hotel and good causes in the Highlands. The interview took place before the Cabinet around Scotland meeting in Dornoch last week.

Mr Salmond also mentioned the world renowned golf course. "Having said all that, the fact that I've never played Royal Dornoch crept into the equation. As someone who has played hundreds of Scottish course, I feel bereft that I've never played Royal Dornoch, but I'll be putting that right soon."

A government spokesman confirmed Mr Salmond did play the course during the trip.

Great marketing for Dornoch and in particular for golfing visitors, yet Labour's Highland and Islands MSP, Peter Peacock (pictured), hit out at the comments yesterday.

"This is an extraordinary admission from Mr Salmond and an abuse of public money," the former education minister said. "I would encourage everyone to come and play at Dornoch, but organising an entire Cabinet meeting to satisfy the golf needs of Alex Salmond is wrong.

"Not only is he hosting Cabinet meetings in seats the SNP are desperate to cling on to, but now he is building them around his golfing plans.

"Taxpayers will be furious at funding Mr Salmond's sporting holidays."

Foolish, foolish man. Not only does he show the quality of Labour MSPs in the Scottish parliament but he was the education minister of the last Scottish government. Is it any wonder the standards of our education have fallen in recent years? Alex Salmond will not have claimed the cost of his round at Royal Dornoch on expenses.

On a serious note, this article was the lead in the political section of the Scotsman. For those of my readers who live outside of Scotland, the Scotsman used to be a reputable broadsheet but its readership has been falling for a few years, since it began to publish an exceptional amount of Labour press releases, most of which are non-stories. You've just read another one.


Wednesday, 4 August 2010

Another Tory Sex Scandal



The leader of Slough's Conservative party has been charged with bigamy.

Cllr Pervez Choudhry (pictured) of Tuns Lane, who represents the Central Ward, was arrested and charged on Monday. The 52-year-old will appear at Maidenhead Magistrates Court next Monday to face one count of bigamy. He has been released on police bail.

Who wanted revenge? A colleague or one of his wives?

All credit to the tories though- they do sex scandals so much better than labour and the libdems!


Take Your Pick



This week's selection:

Captain Ranty - My Work Here Is Done

The Anger of a Quiet Man - Illegal no doubt but they'll try it anyway

Iain Dale - Brown Third Worst PM Since the War (I think he means WWII)

Benedict Brogan - Pakistan knows David Cameron is right

Mr Eugenides - George Foulkes: Time to tighten the belts

Dark Lochnagar - The budget review and Oil

Shootin fae the Shin - The Big Sky

Dr Eamonn Butler - Let's Abolish the Arts Council

Bagehot's Notebook - Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland face up to an age of austerity

Harbinger's Journal - How do you stop people from finding out the truth?

Political Betting - Why's the best contender set to come last?

Scotland Unspun - Sandcastle Sales Rising

The Red Carpet Treatment




Tuesday, 3 August 2010

Edinburgh Festival's Latest 'Wheeze"



Not only is the Edinburgh Festival going to become India's PR company, this year you can have your tea 100ft above Princes Street Gardens.

After delighting guests from Monaco to Las Vegas, the unique attraction will be premiering at the Edinburgh Festival from 1 - 31 August. Guests will enjoy a thrilling dining experience whilst taking in Edinburgh's spectacular skyline suspended at over 100 feet from a luxury 22 seater table and will be treated to a sample of Scotland's finest food and drink.

Prices range from £32.50 for what I would think would be breakfast (morning flight) to £97.50 for some evening flights. Think an Anstruther fish supper, eaten by the harbour with my feet on terra firma, sounds even better than ever!

On a more serious note I find the 'joint initiative' by all of Edinburgh's festivals to develop India-focused programming from 2012 to 2014' concerning. The Festival has gained international fame because it is just that - international. To make it so politically biased doesn't sit well with me. For one country to dominate for three years is not in the spirit of art but profit.

Taxpayers' Gags

For those of you who didn't see Channel 4 News last night. Is this why the NHS shows such little improvement even after the vast investment which has been made in recent years?

I asked in my post this morning 'Is anyone listening?' Seems they are and if they don't like what they hear they have ways of dealing with it. Courtesy of the taxpayer of course.

The NHS Should Not be Protected from Cuts




John Swinney, Scotland's Finance Secretary, continues to insist upon excluding the Scottish health budget from forthcoming cutbacks. Cosla president, Pat Watters, says that protecting Scotland's £11bn health budget would result in local government bearing the brunt of the cuts and threaten the services that councils provide for vulnerable members of society.

Ah - the vulnerable; a word which politicians hope is emotive enough to create sympathy from the 'non-vulnerable' population. It's a word which has been so overused in recent years that it's true meaning has been greatly diminished. Anyone who visits a hospital these days is vulnerable and not just because they're exposed to hospital-acquired infections.

Pat Watters wants the NHS to take its fair share of the reduction in Scotland's budget. The NHS was created to provide healthcare free at the point of delivery for working people who could not afford private treatment for illness or disease. Nowadays many can afford private treatment and can even afford to go abroad for it, yet when things go wrong it's the NHS which is left to sort out the mess - free of charge. How much money does the NHS spend righting the wrongs of foreign and UK-based poorly skilled 'private' surgeons?

The NHS should not be protected from cuts. A root and branch review of our healthcare system is long overdue and one would be required if any changes in the service are to be identified. If NHS expenditure is ring-fenced the organisation will escape scrutiny.

There's a myth that Britain's NHS healthcare is the best in the world. It is not. It's average. Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, to name but a few, provide better healthcare. The myth is perpetuated by those who have vested interests and accepted by those who have never experienced the healthcare system in any of the above countries.

When a retired Scots consultant is prepared to be speak out about the current state of Scotland's NHS, the government should sit up and listen. I met John Blair some twenty two years ago. He was the person who told me my father was terminally ill. We talked on several occasions and I found him to be direct and honest. Another senior doctor in England is prepared to speak out and explain why European Union rulings are causing untold damage to the health service - in particular the European Working Time Regulations.

Is anyone listening to these people?

Monday, 2 August 2010

Uisgich (water)



Scottish Water was formed in 2002 after East, West and North of Scotland Water Authorities merged. They are now the only water and waste water services provider in Scotland, the 4th largest in the UK, covering a huge area of 79,000 square kilometres.

Scottish Water supplies approximately 5 million customers in 2.3 million households. 46,000 kilometres of water pipes and 39,000 kilometres of sewer pipes provide 2.3 billion litres of water and take away 1 billion litres of waste water every day. Water is treated at 1896 water treatment works including 1274 septic tanks, pumping stations, sludge treatment centres and reservoirs. Over 800 water samples are taken each day and 99.44% of water quality tests carried out in 2003 complied with regulations.

Under the Water Services Act (Scotland) 2005, Scottish Water had to split its operation into wholesale (Scottish Water) and retail (Business Stream) units. Formerly known as Scottish Water Business Stream and ostensibly remaining a part of Scottish Water, Business Stream is a new business working completely independent of its parent company in order to ensure fair and transparent retail practice under the rules of the new deregulated marketplace for business customers.

That's a brief history of Scottish Water in the past eight years. In the past few years there have been rumblings and mumblings about privatising Scottish Water. Last week an independent review on Scotland's budget recommended that ownership should be transferred to a 'public interest' board with powers to borrow money from banks rather than rely on taxpayer funding. This would free up the £140m a year currently earmarked for the utility.

Ministers would also get back more than £1bn already given in loans to Scottish Water, helping them to pay for the new infrastructure projects such as the £2bn new Forth Bridge which seems to be having problems already. Maybe they've been following the dreadful situation which has developed with the Edinburgh tram project.

The Independent Budget Review (IBR) last week warned that as many as 50,000 jobs would have to be axed in the public sector over the next four years to cope with what it described as the biggest crisis in public spending since WW2. One of the key areas under strain is Scotland's capital budget - which pays for infrastructure work.

The panel said they were aware of 'strongly held public views' that the service should not be privatised'.

John Swinney, the Finance Secretary, said he believed Scottish Water - which was performing extremely well - should remain under public ownership, yet he was careful not to rule out the not-for-profit option as he did for other of the budget review's recommendations, such as that ministers should reconsider their decision to 'ring-fence' the NHS from cuts and their commitment to free personal care for the elderly and concessionary travel. He has invited opposition parties to talks on the budget review.

The main finance problem we have in Scotland is that we don't have borrowing powers. To create an arms length company to manage Scottish Water will be a disaster for customers. Glasgow City Council tried this on a much smaller scale and it has been spectacularly unsuccessful. Our water should stay in public ownership. It is forecast there will be a world shortage of water and we must hold onto this utility for bargaining purposes. Since gas and electricity have been privatised consumers have borne excessive price rises while companies have made excessive profits.

Scottish Water should stay under government control, although with a change of management because the present management has not been efficient, but I do think it's inevitable it will be sold in the near future. Our water could be an excellent campaigning issue for the SNP. Will they realise that?


Sir Richard Dannett Quits



General Sir Richard Dannatt, the former head of the Army, has stepped down from his role as an advisor to David Cameron after a stay of only nine months. He was appointed to the post during last year's Conservative Party conference - just weeks after retiring as chief of the general staff.

An attempt to install him in the Lords was blocked in April on the grounds that he should wait at least a year before taking up a political role.

He clashed with Liam Fox, who has since been appointed Defence Secretary, for saying publicly he was brought in because the Tory front bench lacked 'expert understanding'. He was quite right and it still does.

Sir Richard said he always intended to step down after the election. On Saturday, in an interview on Sky News, he appeared to criticise George Osborne for insisting that the Ministry of Defence budget bears the full cost of replacing Trident.

“It is effectively being put on the table for discussion by asking the Ministry of Defence to pay for it, so the issue really is: how much safer will we be with a replacement nuclear deterrent as opposed to how much safer will we be with fast jets, aircraft carriers, lots of soldiers, tanks and artillery?”

If he's done nothing else in his short tenure, it is to be hoped his comments will widen the debate about Trident. Why are we storing a weapon we can't use without the authority of another country? Scotland doesn't want it and we have to make our voices heard.


Afghanistan and Scotland's Lack of a Military Hospital Unit



Two members of the British armed forces were killed in Afghanistan yesterday. One was a soldier from 1st Battalion Scots Guards and the other a Marine from 40 Commando Royal Marines.

The soldier, serving as part of Combined Forces Lashkar Gah, was killed by small arms fire while the Marine, serving as part of Combined Forces Sangin, was killed by an IED while on foot patrol. We have now lost 327 of our military in this unwinnable war.

The MSM seldom report casualties yet families of wounded Scots soldiers are treated worse than families of convicts. While prisoners can be sent to jails near home to make visiting easier, wounded Scots are treated in hospitals in England. That means families must travel hundreds of miles to visit loved ones.

There is one specialist military hospital in England plus five with specialist military wards and one in Northern Ireland. But there is none in Scotland despite two health boards being asked to consider making provision as long ago as 1999 - and despite Scotland providing up to 20% of the armed forces' manpower.

The Royal British Legion Scotland is demanding NHS Scotland, along with the MoD, work towards establishing a unit here. The charity has produced a paper making the case for a bid for an MoD Hospital Unit when contracts come up for renewal in 2011.

Meanwhile, Scottish-based families who want to comfort a wounded relative face journeys of several hours, and in some cases pay up to £200 a night for accommodation. As well as the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine in Birmingham, England has MDHUs at Portsmouth, Plymouth, Frimley Park in Surrey, Northallerton and Peterborough. There is also a military ward at Musgrave Park Hospital in Northern Ireland.

The MoD reimburses the travel and accommodation costs for immediate families of the wounded. Other relatives get no help whatsoever so RBLS has set up an initiative called TravelAid to help them. But it's the distance and inconvenience that are the biggest issue. For example, a family from Inverness would have to travel more than 350 miles to Northallerton and 450 to Birmingham, trips of over seven or eight hours.

The Scottish Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said the opening of MDHUs in Scotland was a decision for the MoD, however Westminster Defence Minister Andrew Robathan last week poured cold water on the idea. The MoD's reason is that IMDHUs are also teaching units and there would have to be sufficient volumes of Scottish-based casualties to maintain that. This argument carries the subliminal message that they wouldn't consider putting casualties from England or Wales in a Scottish unit when a unit in Scotland would be more convenient for families from the north of England.

It's long past time Scotland had a MoD Hospital Unit. A considerable part of any person's recovery from injury or illness depends on the level of support they receive from family and friends. Knowing your family is restricted from visiting because of distance will only add to the stress our wounded endure. Military medics often work in tandem with their civilian counterparts and therefore the excuse given by the MoD about volume is a fallacy.


Sunday, 1 August 2010

Update


UPDATE


My apologies but I've been just too occupied elsewhere to write a post this evening.

For those of you who were interested in the devolution post, (not forgetting the comments), Joyce McMillan has now put her column online. The Dog That Did Not Bark: Or, The Strange Silence of the SNP.

A worthwhile read.

We Could Do With This Here

On Saturday, April 24, 2010, over 30 members of the Opera Company of Philadelphia Chorus and principal cast members of LaTraviata converged on the Reading Terminal Market Italian Festival. Wearing street clothes and blending in with the crowd, the artists swung into action as the first orchestral strains of the famed "Brindisi" were piped through the market, giving a rousing, surprise performance for hundreds of delighted onlookers who were there to enjoy the Italian delicacies and the everyday treats that the Reading Terminal Market has to offer.

The four-minute piece drew an overwhelming crowd, and won a thunderous ovation that included both laughter and tears from the audience.

Poll Results, the BBC and the Scottish Government


Surprising result from the 'Has Devolution Delivered for Scotland' Poll which has been running in the side bar for a couple of weeks. Total votes cast were 239.

Of the total votes 43% think devolution is a waste of money and the other answers are spread quite evenly amongst the remaining 47%.

The surprise for me is the number who say devolution is a waste of money and has not delivered. Perhaps that question should have been in two parts because it could be some people think devolution should never have happened and those who feel it has been a total let-down. I don't see much change in people's opinion since devolution was introduced. Having our own parliament hasn't made any difference to those who didn't want it in the first place but it has given hope, (perhaps falsely), to those who consider Scotland should become an independent nation.

Thanks to all who took part. It would seem devolution is delivering - but only just.

This morning Outlander provides much needed criticism of the BBC. Just the other day I heard the end of a radio interview with a heid bummer of the BBC and he admitted Scotland was very short changed. His solution? Nothing. I too firmly believe the Scottish government must take action and now - not tomorrow, next month or next year. Outlander has provided the solutions but will the SNP listen?

Let's see if the Scottish government can stop committing political suicide. Alex widens the debate about the unionist media's manipulation of Scottish politics. His example is perfect. Anyone going into a newsagent this morning will see a picture of John Swinney beside the headline 'Scotland braced for winter of discontent' and automatically the strapline and John Swinney will be mentally associated. Job done. It's that easy. Do have a read of Alex's post because we need to know what kind of thinking the SNP is doing: devolved or independent.

Update 11.40am: Ian Hamilton chips in with his tuppence worth. He too expresses some of my thoughts. Will anyone in the SNP start listening or are we talking to the heather?

Related Posts with Thumbnails