Wednesday 29 April 2009

A Photo Call Too Far


No, not this photograph

Sarah and Gordon Brown posed for photographs yesterday at the entrance to Auschwitz, the Nazi concentration camp in Poland.

I have purposely not published any of the photographs as I find them distasteful. It's quite obvious the PR machine in No 10 has collapsed or else the Brown's desire for publicity has become an obsession.  Such self-interest doesn't reflect well on a man who holds the position of Prime Minister.

The Telegraph has published a photograph should you wish to see one.

31 comments:

Ted Foan said...

It is becoming increasingly clearer to me that Brown is preparing himself (and his wife) for the his inevitable afterlife when he is deposed as Prime Minister. This is another part of his calculated plan to position himself as the champion of the poor, the disadvantaged and the victims of war and obscene regimes throughout the world.

He will set up some form of charitable foundation when he is booted out (a la Blair and Cherie) and spend his time advising on how international funds should be used to achieve his vision of reducing child poverty.

The sooner the better for me!

subrosa said...

His wife already has a charity in the name of the daughter they lost so you're on the right lines there Ted.

Why do labour PMs think they are saviours of the world? Must be something in their rule book.

I still think posing for a photo call at Aschwitz terribly poor judgement.

McGonagall said...

Macabre.

subrosa said...

Indeed scunnert.

CrazyDaisy said...

Perverse, I was in Dachau a couple of years ago researching Propaganda for Psychological purposes, not one person was posing for pics.

The gates there have a poigniant message "Arbeit macht Frei" - glad NuLiebore are going to be remembered for equally dark behaviour - makes you sick.

Obscurity beckons Broon, fuckin stay there.

CD

Faux Cu said...

Insulting and ghoulish when your think of Iraq.

Faux Cu said...

The vote for the Ghurkas is today, supposedly a free vote.

We shall see if Gordon backs down or not.

If he backs down he ay be listening to a adviser with meat between his ears.

If he does not, he is not listening or the people around hi are in disarray. This way Brown will show to all that he has lost it.

Anyway, the little gobshite who defended the Government's position last week should be sent to Afghanistan for target practice.

brownlie said...

The body language in your picture, as in others, suggests that all is not well between this couple.

He appears to have shouldered her out of the way to put himself at the fore-front.

Faux Cu said...

I used to do a lot of work in Poland and spent several days in Krakow.

i went down that salt mine, with the Cathedral and did other touristy things. The one thing I wanted to do but couldn't muster the courage was to visit Aushwitz.

Than C#unt goes there for a photo opportunity.

I a a fully paid up Atheist but sometimes I wish there was a real God of The Old Testament to send down a thunderbolt and carbonise that apology of a human being. I would even plant a couple of trees by was of carbon offset.

Faux Cu said...

Sub R

Scunnert has a erally good series of video on his site regarding Englishness.

This is a segmented TV series which takes 6 Englsh people , by self definition, some of a BNP style and including Carole Thatcher, daughter of Saint Maggy.

They are questioned over how they define themselves with respect to nationality.

Then they offer up a cheek swab for DNA profiling as to their racial origins.

The results are astounding and in some cases hilarious.

Takes some time to watch and jumps about a bit in flow but as I say, take the time and enjoy it.

http://scunnert-nation.blogspot.com/2009/04/100-english.html

Seems like the English are no homogeneous gene pool that go way way back but a right Heinz 57 varieties, and no less for that.

Now we know why the English, according to Dr David Starkey, are unique in having no national dress. It is because this would be a French Beret or a Fez, a pair of leather breeks or Greek Pantaloons, wearing wooen clogs or grass wrappings. This is the just the people who have blonde hair and blue eyes!

It is really funny to see their reactions to their racial origins.

Just goes to prove the the definition of nationality has be be based on cultural values rather than perceived racial ones.

I just wish that I cold give the Little Englanders who infest France with copies of this programme on DVD

subrosa said...

CD Nobody poses for pictures there. I notice the Mail has quite a few.

He just doesn't get it does he.

subrosa said...

FC right enough. Oh thanks for that info FC, I'll look up what time the debate is. Tomorrow of course it's the expenses debate.

Faux Cu said...

Brwolie

Do you think that anything was "right" with that marriage, from the start.

I wonder why?

subrosa said...

Oh Brownlie, I'm glad you've never seen a photo of me! That one I put was when they were 'walking' to their Conference last year if you remember. You know, doing another photo call.

subrosa said...

FC it's a long time since I was there. Belsen I found more tragic, don't ask me why. Mind you, since the days I visited these places they have been 'modernised' for the visitor I believe.

subrosa said...

I missed that FC, I usually read scunnert's blog daily. Will have a look. Can do it in the evenings so thanks.

Cate Munro said...

Excuse my French SR, but the whole thing is a fucking disgrace. I'll gen up more during the day ans write something a little more eloquent! ;-)

Vronsky said...

Labour have a use for Auschwitz. George Robertson made a speech there, making sure he mentioned the 'dark side of nationalism'. You will also remember the outcry from Labour when the SNP ended school visits to the camp. And now this photograph. What is going on here?

The subtext to this line of PR is 'look at us - we are not fascists, we don't approve of fascism. Fascism is them, not us'. It hopes to distance Labour from that sort of extreme authoritarianism, lest we take the evidence of our own eyes and notice that that is in fact what they are dragging us towards. It is a sort of reverse camouflage - instead of looking the same as their background, they place themselves against an unpleasant background and try to look different.

Pretty much the same dynamic is in play at the memorial services at the Cenotaph. 'We must never let this happen again' they say - as they arrange new illegal wars of aggression - wars that the military tribunal at Nuremberg called 'the supreme international crime'.

For Labour, Auschwitz is their Picture of Dorian Grey.

subrosa said...

Plenty folk feel like you TP. The Mail has a whole set of the bluddy photos - nauseating.

subrosa said...

Thank you Vronsky I had quite forgotten about George Robertson and his speech.

I protested about teenagers being sent to Auschwitz as I thought it wrong. It's some place best visited when you're older if you feel the need to visit at all.

Good comparison and I would agree with you. Why are we giving £60m to the cause too? Auscwitz is very well funded and there are other less well-known charities which would have appreciated even a few thousand.

Anonymous said...

I'm glad that I'm not the only one who found this distasteful and inappropriate.

I was particularly sickened by the posed picture of Mrs Brown crying. I have no problem in admitting that I too, would probably cry, were I to go there. I just wouldn't use it as a publicity shot.

Cheap and nasty doesn't come anywhere near saying what I think of this little caper. And most disrepectful to the memory of real and vile suffering, to use it for publicity.

Sleazy to the end.

The word verification on this post is WAKER, dangerously close to what I think of Brown.

subrosa said...

It's all too much for me I'm afraid Tris. I know it's 'only' photographs but it shows the mentality and morality of these people and I don't like it, I don't like it at all.

Faux Cu said...

And to give you a taste of what Labour activists are thinking, on Labourlist they are debating about whether Brown should go.

Here is a cracker

james thompson @ 12:57 pm, Wed 29th Apr 2009
reply to this comment ·
Pretty persuasive post, James. The question is which damnation should Labour choose? As in all real moral political decisions, it's a choice between the lesser of two evils.


The lesser of two evils

Doing what is good for Brown and letting him be.
or
Doing what is better for the UK and kicking Brown out.

Some decison, for some anyway.

subrosa said...

You're reading labourlist? Ouch! lol

Faux Cu said...

Not reading, haunting.

Faux Cu said...

Post No t from me

The vote for the Ghurkas is today, supposedly a free vote.

We shall see if Gordon backs down or not.

If he backs down he ay be listening to a adviser with meat between his ears.

"If he does not, he is not listening or the people around him are in disarray. This way Brown will show to all that he has lost it.

Anyway, the little gobshite who defended the Government's position last week should be sent to Afghanistan for target practice."


Well it looks like Gorgon is a real committed goner. Even hisnown are turning on him.

Can't be long now.

One big push!

brownlie said...

subrosa,

I've got photos of you but for some reason they're all black and white! hee! hee!

Swiss Bob said...

Ms Subrosa,

Your post was the inspiration for this: BROWN OVER AUSCHWITZ

subrosa said...

Sepia please Brownlie, sepia :)

subrosa said...

Excellent post Bob. Hopefully others shall a look at Bob's link.

Baron's Life said...

I agree with Scunnert...Macabre can truly only describe it .I can only add.. To exploit the dead...now that's the lowest of the lowest

Related Posts with Thumbnails