Details of Petition:
“To continue to allow the EU commissioners to defraud the EU population is tantamount to theft by every politician representing the population which makes up the EU. This is something which the UK population does not wish to be involved through continued huge donation of taxpayer pounds to this corrupt organisation. If this cannot be sorted within a year then we need to withdraw unilaterally and completely from the EU.”
Thank you for your e-petition.
The UK has always been determined to ensure that EU funds are used properly and efficiently. The UK was instrumental in setting up the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and strongly supported the establishment of the European Commission’s internal audit service as an independent unit. In addition, the financial rules have been strengthened with the introduction in 2003, amended in 2007, of a new Financial Regulation, which sets out clear rules for those officials able to authorise spending - similar to those for accounting officers in the UK.
The government is disappointed that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has been unable to give the EU accounts a clean bill of health for the 14th year in succession. This continues to be a matter of real concern as mismanagement of public funds undermines the confidence of taxpayers in the EU.
While the government welcomes the fact that a greater proportion of expenditure is now getting a positive Statement of Assurance, it is clear that much remains to be done. The UK will continue to press member states as well as the European Commission to take further action to support sound implementation of the European budget.
There is no evidence of widespread corruption within the EU. The government is confident that there are robust procedures in place to ensure that any malpractice identified will be thoroughly investigated.
Finally, the UK firmly believes that continued Membership of the EU is strongly in the UK’s national interest. The EU is the UK’s main trading partner with trade worth in excess of £400 billion, or 52% of the UK’s total trade in goods and services. The free movement of goods, labour and capital under the single market has raised gross domestic product by an estimated 2.2% across the EU, bringing an average benefit per person of £360 a year and a higher standard of living for UK citizens.
Membership of the EU brings other real benefits, many of which are not easily quantifiable. By working together with other European countries, we can achieve much more in terms of promoting peace and stability, economic prosperity, environmental protection, and a range of other important issues than we could achieve by ourselves.
13 comments:
SR,
Aye and who bartered away our fishing - 1/3 of the EU fishing grounds - the Tories and Labour say the EU is not corrupt - liars.
Roll on Independence - want access to our waters then you have to comply with our demands not Westmiddens!
Can't wait.
Crazy D
Three hundred and sixty quid? That's it? That's the benefit of surrendering sovereignty and accepting corruption as normal business practice? I'd gladly pay 360 quid pa to live in an independent and sovereign Scotland.
"There is no evidence of widespread corruption within the EU."
The evidence walks around. Neil Kinnock and family for starters. Then there's Mandymince of Brazil fame.
The EU is worse than Labour and the Tory's for curruption, most of it is just pen pushers living a cosy life.
............
Subrosa, recived your email. Sent you a reply. One day its fine then the next its buggerd, real pain..
Thanks Spook xx It's the same on my Mac here, I think Bogger is having serious problems that they haven't flagged up.
Oh OR love the descriptions. Imagine sending out that email to all petitioners though - how stupid can they get.
lol Subrosa indeed..
Subrosa check out my latest post, can you shed any light on this.
I have sorted out the problem but i had to temp remove the people who follow my blog widget so my blog can load properly. Real pain but im not putting it back on until blooger has fixed it. I havnt lost any data coz its stored anyway and when you put the widget back on all your followers appear again. Agrr oh hoos poos..
SR,
Seems posts from work haven't reached ye! Where was I? Yes the EU - corrupt as fuck, when we have control of our EEZ we call the shots, since the Torys gladly bartered away our fish for Westmiddens ends - oh corruption again!
Been nice to have the Fisheries Minister explain what he was giving it away to Europe and why - after all they are accountable to the UK public.
But no Edward Heath that useless ex fat git, glad he's dead, sold us down the Tay/Dee/Clyde sod the Scots and their fishing industry - and that sticks in 4 generations of my family's throat - dispensable the Scots Fishin Industry is!
Makes you mad, rage rage rage!
Crazy D
Doubtless, they keep sacking the whistle-blowers before they put their shredding machines into action. Their contention that there is no evidence might be accurate.
Bastards.
Hello Faust. Does the EU sack anyone? I'm quite sure the shredders have been working for at least the past couple of weeks since the German TV intruded on the case.
CD there's been something badly wrong with blogger in the past few days and no I didn't receive anything from you apart from this and your other post.
I missed you :)
How do we get to the bottom of EU corruption when we have a government who says there's no evidence of corruption?
This is a difficult one because the bodies which spend the money are usually not actually EU bodies.
Highland Council for example.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/highlands_and_islands/7932801.stm
The SNP Government quite rightly tried to get the amount to be repaid to the EU reduced but that action will in itself contribute to the perception of corruption because the money will be recorded as having gone missing essentially.
I don't think Highland Council are corrupt, however, perhaps just a bit incompetent.
At a lower level we are seeing the same thing with many community projects funded through community planning partnerships. I know quite a few organisations which have lost funding because they have not been able to account for how it has all been spent.
On one level that is quite correct but on another it means that some quite good projects have gone to the wall because they have not crossed every t and dotted every i.
The other aspect that interests me is the conjunction - which is very common - between fulminating against EU bureacracy while at the same time being outraged that the books are not signed off. That suggests that EU bureacracy is not quite as fearsome as imagined - although as I have suggested it is the auditing practices of the receiving organisations which may be lax. The EU is lax inasmuch as it lets these things go.
Finally I wonder if anybody can point me in the direction of the UK's audited accounts?
As always Indy you give me plenty food for thought. I've just made a brief search on yahoo and get nothing about the UK's audited accounts, only endless waffle from the Audit Commission.
It is sad that well-meaning small projects go by the board but what I don't understand is does nobody understand basic book-keeping in this country anymore? There seems to be a great fear of recording money in and money out for some reason.
The EU ought to be setting an example not condoning incompetence.
Post a Comment