Showing posts with label prisoners perks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prisoners perks. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 January 2011

Bribery


For years I've been the owner of a pachira aquatica, commonly known as a money tree.  In fact I've owned several because they grow reasonably fast so I've chopped them up, given cuttings to all and sundry, then started again.  The original was given to me by an old gardener who insisted I should always keep one in the house.  Then I would always have something in my purse he said. As I held him in great esteem I've never been brave enough to test the myth.

That's really irrelevant to this post, the pachira aquatica I mean, but money is.  Money as used in bribery; defined as giving it to a person or people to influence or persuade them.  Money is used by politicians for that purpose.  There's lots of it distributed too and it's taxpayers' money - our money.

Parts of our society have become used to bribery.  We give money to teenagers to 'persuade' them to stay on at school past the age of 16.  We can pay 85% of a mature student's child care costs.  There are plenty other situations in which money is used by government as a bribe.  Some people's circumstances are worthy of support but others seem excessive.

One in particular I found simply wrong.  Whilst reading prisoners have received a 7% rise in their pay since the beginning of the recession, I noticed this snippet:

The best paid prisoners are the ones who work in charity shops and receive £18 a week, while others who work in prison catering or go on educational and training courses get £12. (source)


Why should prisoners be paid to go on educational and training courses?  I don't get paid to do that. In the years when it was compulsory to attend such courses, my company paid the fee but I had to provide the cost of travel and subsistence.  Today when I attend further education I pay the fee and the travel.

We have our priorities wrong.  Prisoners are being better cared for than a vast section of our society. Recently I wrote about new televisions which are being provided for individual prisoners and just last week about free bus passes.

Do all these handouts/bribes show positive results or have we lapsed into the attitude of DFID, which has 'lost' £1 billion of foreign aid?

Should we be paying some to attend education when others in England are being asked to pay fees up to £9,000 per year?  I think not.

Friday, 26 June 2009

Scotland's 'Soft Touch' Prisons

A prisoner enjoys his yoga lesson

We've been hearing quite a bit about Scotland's prisons recently and in particular the 'open estate'.

What we haven't heard so much about is the list of entertainment offered to prisoners, in addition to television, play stations and the rest. Yes I do mean entertainment because many of the courses and therapies offered free of charge to prisoners would be enjoyable for me too if I could afford them. Yoga, hand massage, head and neck massage, website design and pottery are some of the courses on offer. I'm jealous.

The classes, run by private practitioners, NHS staff, college lecturers and prison staff, are among more than 100 health, sporting and educational programmes offered by the Scottish Prison Service. None of the classes leads to a recognised qualification but are aimed at improving prisoners' wellbeing and preparing them for release. Prisoners serving sentences in open prisons are also offered hill walking and cycling.

Critics say the prison classes are symptomatic of a 'soft touch' justice system and should be reviewed. I entirely agree and I'm sure every victim of a criminal does too.

Seems like good old-fashioned work is out of the question for those who commit crimes. Isn't it time we installed the likes of Joe Arpaio? His re-offending rate is the lowest in the US.

Isn't this an ideal opportunity for the SNP to stop this soft touch system and introduce something similar to Joe Arpaio? No wonder the re-offending level is at around 85% in our criminal community when they're given all this, courtesy your and mine hard earned money. Yes I know the US doesn't come under the legislation of our Human Rights Act but what does this say about it? It was introduced, with great aplomb, to say it would make life fairer for victims.

Please, we really need to look very closely at what is happening in our country with regard to this legislation. We can't continue to ignore the damage this Act does to these victims and promoting the advantages shown to the criminals is showing how far the morals of our society have fallen.

Related Posts with Thumbnails