Showing posts with label Police Service. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Police Service. Show all posts
Friday, 8 October 2010
Hate Crime Guidance Manual
Our police force is intended to protect the lawful against those suspected as acting unlawfully, yet they're now involved in actually writing the laws.
People who indulge in public sex outdoors should not be denied police protection against hate crimes, even when their actions are unlawful, chief police officers have said. Officers have a duty to protect people who are victimised or targeted as a result of having sex in public, the guidance, issued by the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland, said.
The Hate Crime Guidance Manual said issues surrounding open-air sex 'can be complex' but warned that 'police must accept they have the dual responsibility of ensuring that any victims of crime in such environments receive a professional response'. The guidance, published last week, said: 'Whilst complaints regarding consensual public sex must be considered and responded to, it must also be noted that people engaging in such activity are potential targets for hate crime perpetrators'.
Now, I have to problem with anyone having the urge to have sex on some deserted beach somewhere in Scotland on a braw bricht moonlich nicht. It's people who actively seek places where they know they will have an 'audience' that concern me. As far as I'm aware 'dogging' is illegal yet now Scotland's police are instructed to give protection to those who so blatantly flaunt our justice system. I pay my taxes for the police to arrest those who break the law. These people are lawbreakers. They deserve no protection.
One Kent officer said: "So now we are being told not just to turn a blind eye to public indecency, we are being told to arrest anyone who has anything bad to say against people taking part in outdoor sex.
"It's getting to the stage that people who break the law have more rights than the normal man or woman in the street and as for them suffering from post traumatic stress, what about the people who witness these exhibitions and are shocked by it? What about their rights?"
Thankfully there appears to be a few police still around who possess common sense.
source
Labels:
Police Service
Friday, 6 August 2010
Lessons Are Never Learned

Bear with me on this one please.
These three children are dead. They were found in an Edinburgh flat on Wednesday and their mother is said to have jumped from a balcony and sustained serious injuries.
Their parents, Theresa and Pasquale Riggi (both American). were involved in a bitter divorce battle and their mother was due to attend court on Tuesday for a hearing regarding the case. She didn't attend.
The mother and the children went missing on 4 July from the family home at Skene near Aberdeen. The husband had moved out of the house and was staying at a flat in Aberdeen. He didn't find out until 11 July that his wife and the children had left and called police to report them missing. Ports and airports were alerted in case the mother tried to leave the country with the children. Grampian police issued a missing persons appeal on 16 July.
Then, on 21 July, Lothian and Borders officers traced the mother and the children to the flat in Slateford Road, Edinburgh where Wednesday's tragedy unfolded. At that point, it was a simple missing persons inquiry. A police spokesman said: "Officers attended the address and found the family safe and well on 21 July."
That's what is known until last Tuesday, when at the Court, after the husband had spoken to his wife by phone, his lawyer told Lady Clark, who was the judge at the hearing, that Mr Riggi had concerns about his children. Mr Riggi's lawyer said there was a real emergency and Lady Clark obviously concurred with his statement. She asked court officials to find the children and said social workers should supervise them. She also stated that the social workers should apply to a local sheriff for child protection orders if they felt they were necessary.
That was Tuesday.
Edinburgh City Council said their social workers had no reason to get involved with the family before Lady Clark made her order. They said in a statement: "We received a phone call yesterday afternoon (I suspect that was Tuesday although the article is not clear) from lawyers regarding the court proceedings involving the family.
"The court's ruling was then faxed through to us at 15.05. Was this on the Tuesday or Wednesday? "In this fax we were asked to assist with the family's situation if and when they were found by the messenger at arms representing the court." By that time it was too late.
The police knew where the mother and children were yet they weren't informed of the court order.
What has gone wrong with the communication between these agencies who are supposed to protect us? Why are courts using a fax system for information when there are so many systems available these days and yet a phone call didn't seem important? Taxpayers spend billions on services such as justice, police and social workers. Government appears to have personal details on each and every one of us.
We hear so much verbosity from these agencies about how they communicate and will 'learn lessons'. I've no wish to attribute blame to anyone, yet it's deeply concerning that a phone call and a fax to the local council appears to be enough for these agencies to will no doubt, eventually, blame each other.
I can remember the days when police knew everything and we didn't have social workers - or not those who are called social workers these days. These were the days when home schooling had never been heard of, yet this mother insisted her children were home school and the father protested. These were the days when a court order was acted upon immediately by the police. But now it appears it has to initially go to the local council. Why? I suspect some left-thinking labour politician here in Scotland thought up a reason which the courts lapped up.
Surely, if children don't attend school the relevant social work authority should be on red alert? Then again, none of our regular services seems to come under the regulations set for the military. Why can't lessons be learnt? Because our law enforcers are charged with teaching them.
Update: I have been accused of denigrating home education (see comments). My use of the words 'red alert' regarding social work authorities was in connection with this particular case when allegedly the children and their mother had earlier become listed as missing persons. It's my opinion that social work too should have been informed they were missing regardless of whether they were state educated, privately educated or home educated. Also I was not aware the law had been changed regarding home education. I know years ago home educators and the children were monitored on a regular basis - usually to provide the parent with updates from educational developments which they may have missed. There was no internet in those days.
This post is not about home education, it's about the agencies involved in this case and their procedures which were totally inadequate. There's no excuse in today's society for this inefficiency. I can hear the relevant agencies saying 'lessons will be learned'. They never are.
Labels:
Police Service,
Scottish justice,
social services
Wednesday, 7 October 2009
Free Taxis for Drunks

If the above young woman lived in Norfolk the police would bundle her into a taxi and send her home - all paid for by the taxpayer.
The taxis will be provided late on Friday and Saturday nights in a bid to cut anti-social behaviour.
Councillors in Watton, Norfolk agreed a £350 grant for a three-month trial of the plan, devised by Norfolk Police Safer Neighbourhood Team. Police have asked town taxi firm Ann's Cars to do three runs a night from 11.30pm to 2am, but admit they have no idea how much it will cost.
Sgt Lance Ogbourne said :"The aim is to catch people who would normally walk home. These people can cause criminal damage."
A Taxpayers' Alliance spokesman said: "This is not policing. It's molly-coddling at the expense of the taxpayers. If someone gets drunk it is their responsibility to find their own way home."
I firmly agree with the Taxpayers' Alliance. Also I can foresee many problems, one being what the taxi driver does when they arrive at the drunk's home. Is it their responsibility to ensure the drunk is safely inside or is leaving them lying on the pavement acceptable? This whole idea is fraught with dangers for the taxi drivers and I'm surprised any is prepared to take part in this ludicrous scheme.
The solution is to bundle them into the black maria, take them to the nearest police station and lock them in a cell overnight - for their own safety you understand.
That is the type of policing we expect, not washing their hands of the problem and pushing it onto private businesses.
Let's hope Ann's Cars think again.
Source: Media Coverage
Wednesday, 23 September 2009
When Did the Police Stop Protecting Us?

This is Francecca Hardwick (left) and her mother Fiona Pilkington. Ms Pilkington, 38, is thought to have murdered her 18 year old daughter Francecca after setting light to their car in a lay-by on the A47 bear Earl Shilton, Leicestershire, in October 2007.
At the inquest it merged that Ms Pilkington, Francecca (known as Frankie) and her brother Anthony, now 19, had been subjected to 15 years of abuse at their home in Bardon Road in nearby Barwell.
At Loughborough Town Hall a jury was told their home had been pelted with flour, eggs and stones. The gang, some as young as 10, also shouted vile abuse at her daughter, who had severe learning difficulties, as well as locking Anthony in a shed at knifepoint.
They regularly shouted obscenities at Frankie and Anthony while they were in their bedroom, demanding the teenage girl, who liked to go out in the rain to 'jump in puddles', lift up her nightdress.
At one point they threatened to kill Ms Pilkington's children, while on another occasion they gang beat Anthony, who has severe dyslexia, with an iron bar.
But despite a catalogue of abuse, read out in court, Leicestershire Police failed to prosecute one member of the gang.
Ms Pilkington contacted the police for help on several occasions but the force even failed to send an officer most of the time and most of the incidents were closed after she decided not to prosecute her family's tormentors for fear of reprisals. The children's mother also wrote to her MP asking for help.
I am horrified at this story as I'm sure many of you are. My rage with the police service and the others who should have helped this mother, plus knowing she was driven to such a pit of despair, shows how broken our society has become in recent years.
Oh I know Leicestershire police will have an internal investigation and wrists will be slapped, but not one police officer will lose their job and their handsome pension; while a young lad has lost his mother and sister because of their inability to do the basics we expect from our police - protect the innocent.
The change in the police service has been so gradual I think some of us are only now becoming aware that they are not there to serve us, but to serve their masters. Another of Gordon Brown's legacies.
Source: Telegraph
Labels:
Leicestershire Police,
Police Service
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


