Showing posts with label American boycott of Scotland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American boycott of Scotland. Show all posts
Wednesday, 14 September 2011
Go For It Dundee!
The photograph is of the Dundee Highland Games; Dundee New York State that is not Dundee, Scotland where the games were abandoned in 1998 because the local burghers decided a turnout of 1,500 showed a lack of public interest.
Dundee USA has a population of 1,700 and 1,200 of them turned out to support their first games and many more were expected to attend this year. What lesson can Bonnie Dundee learn from their US namesakes?
The obvious one is that Scottish culture is appreciated worldwide and those of us who live here have forgotten we must continue our traditions or they will be lost. That's what happened in Dundee in 1998.
However, Dundee's Lord Provost, John Letford, wants to resurrect Dundee's Highland Games and would be interested to hear from people involved with pipe bands, sports clubs and organising beauty pageants (I jest).
Participants don't need to live in Dundee to take part in the fun. The Braemar Gathering attracts participants and many thousands of spectators from all over the world and Braemar's situated in the middle of the Grampians. So if you think you can wield a caber, bang a drum or have a dog which hasn't quite made the grade at Crufts but could aspire to greatness at the 'Best In Show' event, give Mr Letford your support. He has mine.
source
Tuesday, 2 November 2010
42% Better? Not For Me it Isn't
Today Friends of the Earth Scotland issued a press release publicising their latest research. In their opinion meeting our climate targets could 'increase employment, cut health-care costs and reduce social exclusion'. The report is entitled '42% Better'.
I'd like to comment briefly on a few bits of their report because it does disappoint me the lengths to which these pro-environmental campaigners will go to substantiate the biggest scam in recent times.
I sincerely believe that we need to reduce pollution all over the world. As a person who respects the soil and the environment but not to a hysterical degree, I compost and send the my excess leaves off to the council in a bin along with those garden prunings which I know will take a couple of decades to reduce to a decent composition. But I'm not longer allowed to have get rid of my leaves by burning them. ( Now therein lies another story - perhaps for tomorrow).
I'm told to divide cooked food into my 'garden surplus' (the stuff you shouldn't even considering composing) into a separate bin destined for recyling is a lie. In my area all bins, with the exception of paper bins, all go into the same landfilll. I don't use my paper bin because I don't buy newspapers and I shred everything I receive by post, That, I think in my naviety, thinks protects my identity.
Yet some of the biggest and wealthiest countries are ignoring my efforts I think that's a waste of time. I appreciate the question of pollution but I don't think Scotland is going to rescue the rest of the world by introducing extreme measures or rescue Scotland. I won't go into statistics (they're boring and you can spend days trying to find sensible numbers) but I will name a couple of countries who have no regard for this emissions scam. China and India have increased their carbon emissions and continue to do so even although we plough billions of our hard earned money into them through the Yet our wee island's governments feel we must continue down the road, (oops they don't like the word roads the FoE), of ensuring any good living citizen in this country who works/has worked for years will be financially broke.
Yet some of the biggest and wealthiest countries are ignoring my efforts I think that's a waste of time. I appreciate the question of pollution but I don't think Scotland is going to rescue the rest of the world by introducing extreme measures or rescue Scotland. I won't go into statistics (they're boring and you can spend days trying to find sensible numbers) but I will name a couple of countries who have no regard for this emissions scam. China and India have increased their carbon emissions and continue to do so even although we plough billions of our hard earned money into them through the Yet our wee island's governments feel we must continue down the road, (oops they don't like the word roads the FoE), of ensuring any good living citizen in this country who works/has worked for years will be financially broke.
The report, '42% Better', identifies extra jobs in energy efficiency and public transport, health care savings arising from reduced obesity, improved mental health and reduced respiratory disease, and social inclusion gains from reductions in fuel poverty amongst the many non-environmental benefits of a strong climate policy. Even in the limited case studies examined, the estimated value of the health benefits alone exceeds £2bn.
Have you ever heard such nonsense? Let me give you another quote from Duncan McLaren, CE of FoE Scotland.
"The report focuses on policy measures in the parts of our economy unaffected by the European Union's emissions trading scheme: such as housing, transport and agriculture."
So we're not dancing to the EU's emissions trading scheme which currently excludes housing, transport and agriculture.
In this next quote I have highlighted what I consider are pure spin (to be polite) points in bold.
For example, improving and insulating the homes of those in fuel poverty in Scotland, could avoid an estimated 180,000 cases of anxiety and depression each year, and cut days lost to work and school as a result of respiratory illnesses by up to 25%. The increased levels of fitness resulting from raising cycling rates to Danish levels could save over 1,600 lives a year, and help cut obesity rates in Scotland in half, especially if supported by the widespread adoption of low-carbon, low-meat diets.
Let me start by saying how will improving and insulating homes of many of us in fuel poverty 'eliminate 180,000 cases of anxiety and depressions each year? I qualify for the term 'fuel poverty' but because I claim no other benefits I'm refused help. By dipping into my small savings I can pay my bills - for now. Do these people really think that by improving homes with insulation will reduce anxiety and depression? They haven't spoken to anyone in my age group who would tell them that our anxiety - which may lead to depression - is cause by the knowledge that we utility users know we will have to cough up more and more of our pension(s) to fund this great scam.
days lost to work and school as a result of respiratory illnesses by up to 25%.
How can these people make that statement defeats me. It's brainwashing. There is no scientific evidence that this will happen. In fact, since the ban on smoking in pubs and public places came into our legislative process. Even worse is the propaganda pushed out by statistics yet this blogger has been diligent enough to analyse the figures. Please do look.
There's nothing more I could desire than Scotland manufacture (and invented) products which could be sold world wide in connection with reducing polutution. I have no objection to driving a low emissions car yet I do have objections a driving 'a electric car. One of those things wouldn't get me to and back from the shops in Dundee or Perth and I can't see plugs lining my route home. Just for those of you who have been courageous enough to read this far, I run a car which costs me £30 a year in tax. It can cope with four passengers comfortably over a couple of hours trip and I still get around 55 to the gallon. It's diesel. The emissions are low. Would I want to do 1000 miles in a day in it? Naw. I'd have to have an ambulance waiting at my destination because it's not a 'comfort' car, it's a utility one. That's all I need.
We still produce the best engineers in the world, (albeit with a couple of them in the US), yet our engineers are moving to other countries to work and then import their excellent products to us. What does that say about Scotland or the UK.
Of course there are short-term benefits from this scam, there always are from scams. The jobs will be short-term. How many windmills can we produce? A lot less than ships which have been essential to the civilised work for centuries.
It's hard to find the details of how often these windmills would need replaced, yet the expense of erecting and maintaining them is vast. Maintaining windmills won't last forever. We will always require boats/ships/fishermen/engineers/care workers. I could give an endless list of a coherent society and well balanced society. However this week it was announced by one major utility company they intend to raise the cost of domestic rate by just less than 10%. That's only the beginning, believe me. No government will argue with the multiples. We were sold out years ago when our basic utilities were privatised. But then, those of us who still believe in common sense in fuel tariffs and support those of our older generation who hadn't planned for such extreme bills, but are want to have a standard of living which doesn't require other taxpayers to subsidise, aren't taken in by the FoE.
The answer from our politicians will be the same as David Cameron gave yesterday about giving our military's independence to France. "I can't do anything". We pay them for doing nothing. Remember that on polling day.
source: Friends of the Earth Scotland
Sunday, 20 September 2009
America Boycotts Scotland - An American View

Remember a few weeks ago when the MSM were reporting most of America intended to boycott Scotland? A website appeared, in fact several sites, Americans were canceling trips to Scotland, refusing to purchases Scottish goods and us Scots were going to sink into poverty and obscurity because we would no longer be friends with the great U S of A.
I have an interest in writing (don't splutter) and I read a few excellent writers' blogs. One of these is the work of Jeanne Tomlin and I noticed last week Jeanne had written a post about the Lockerbie Bomber. I shall quote it in full here along with her reply to me.
Lockerbie Bomber
I normally stay out of politics, but I'm upset enough by things I'm seeing said that this one time I'm giving my strong opinion. Just this once.
Many people seem to be unaware that Lockerbie is in Scotland and that large numbers of Scots were killed in the Lockerbiebombing. A large part of a Scottish town (Lockerbie) was destroyed in that incident.
However, there seems to be nothing surprising in a Americas being unaware of the concept that another country has their own laws and should follow them. Certainly, the concept ofCompassion is unknown in American "justice."
Well, it is part of the legal system of Scotland. They followed their laws, not ours--as they should have. If there were someone to boycott to get this point across, I assure you I would.
I just returned from Scotland. Next year, I will go to Scotland again. And I have sent congratulations to my Scottish friends.
And apologies for the bullying attitude of many Americans, most especially the ridiculous and offensive letter from the head of the FBI indicating that Scots should have followed American law instead of Scottish law and that somehow Scottish law did not matter. SHAME on you, Mr. Mueller. Shame! Shame for telling Scotland they shouldn't have followed their own laws. Shame for trying to bully another country.
And this from a country that waterboards and threatens prisoners with power drills. Oh, we have a LOT to brag about. We execute the mentally ill (Texas is part of this country, right?) and want other countries to follow our example. I think we'd be better off following Scotland's example rather than screaming at them.
America has long acted like a bully in international affairs and this just shows, in my opinion, that a change in administration hasn't changed that--to my sorrow and continued shame.
I assure you that not all Americans are so stupid they are unaware there were Scottish victims of this bombing, that there is doubt the man was even guilty, and that Scotland had the right to make the decision.
Good job standing up to bullies, Mr. MacAskill and Mr. Salmond!
Many people seem to be unaware that Lockerbie is in Scotland and that large numbers of Scots were killed in the Lockerbiebombing. A large part of a Scottish town (Lockerbie) was destroyed in that incident.
However, there seems to be nothing surprising in a Americas being unaware of the concept that another country has their own laws and should follow them. Certainly, the concept ofCompassion is unknown in American "justice."
Well, it is part of the legal system of Scotland. They followed their laws, not ours--as they should have. If there were someone to boycott to get this point across, I assure you I would.
I just returned from Scotland. Next year, I will go to Scotland again. And I have sent congratulations to my Scottish friends.
And apologies for the bullying attitude of many Americans, most especially the ridiculous and offensive letter from the head of the FBI indicating that Scots should have followed American law instead of Scottish law and that somehow Scottish law did not matter. SHAME on you, Mr. Mueller. Shame! Shame for telling Scotland they shouldn't have followed their own laws. Shame for trying to bully another country.
And this from a country that waterboards and threatens prisoners with power drills. Oh, we have a LOT to brag about. We execute the mentally ill (Texas is part of this country, right?) and want other countries to follow our example. I think we'd be better off following Scotland's example rather than screaming at them.
America has long acted like a bully in international affairs and this just shows, in my opinion, that a change in administration hasn't changed that--to my sorrow and continued shame.
I assure you that not all Americans are so stupid they are unaware there were Scottish victims of this bombing, that there is doubt the man was even guilty, and that Scotland had the right to make the decision.
Good job standing up to bullies, Mr. MacAskill and Mr. Salmond!
Reply to my comment on her blog:
And 99.9% of the talk of boycotts was, I'm sorry to say, coverage by the BBC and other publications over there. Unfortunately, I thought it was purely politically motivated.
Look at that nonsense about Harris Tweed taking Scotland out of their advertising. It was totally spurious. And who, one might ask, started THAT story? I challenged several journalists to justify just copying the story without checking whether the individual quoted even had the authority to make such a major change.
Of course, he did not.
Look at that nonsense about Harris Tweed taking Scotland out of their advertising. It was totally spurious. And who, one might ask, started THAT story? I challenged several journalists to justify just copying the story without checking whether the individual quoted even had the authority to make such a major change.
Of course, he did not.
Thank you Jeanne.
Labels:
American boycott of Scotland
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



