Saturday, 5 February 2011

The Clucking Tosspots - Guest Post

I wrote the following nearly a year ago and it is perhaps even more relevant today.

I don't know if it's the same the world over, but they seem endemic in UK society and particularly rife in positions of authority.

These people have statistics coming out of their ears, can quote them chapter and verse and deduce from the resultant mash the precise constituents of cause and likely effects. Mr & Mrs Clucking Tosspots are the coroners for societies ills and the standard bearers for it's salvation. Who, from their statistical bag of averaged averages, produce the potions and prognoses we should all swallow and aspire to.

Don't know why, whether its down to a new awareness on my part or a growing commitment on their's, but it does seem as though there's been an exponential growth in the ranks of Tosspots in the last couple of decades. Though the growth by itself could be explained by the Tosspot pool contained in government nurturing and recruiting those of a similar disposition to NGO's, quasi committees, quango's and other positions of authority that are within the governments gift or remit.

Probably the Tosspot effect accelerated when their Clucking could be transmitted over the mass entertainment medias of radio, television and films. When popularity was morphed into marketing by the advertising gurus and the spin of ideal homes and whiter than white washes was spun into ideologies and doctrines of material illusionism. When marketing became a tool not just to promote products but to fertilise minds in the secular religions of free markets, of capitalism over communism - or any other 'ism that challenged or threatened capitalism freedom to manuevre and prosper. While the other ism's polluted their ideologies with despots, capitalism disguised its despots by philantrophy, better tunes and the mastering of marketing control of democracy. It's probably around this stage that, whether by design or happy accident, the market gurus became aware of the potential of Clucking Tosspots at, or near the top of positions of authority.

How else can we explain the likes of Reagan, Kissenger,Thatcher, Nixon, Ford, Bush Snr, Major, The Clintons, Bush Jnr, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Blair, Brown, Straw, Prescot???, Balls, Hoone, Byers et al; to name but a few of the top echelon, how such mediocrity could succeed to such high office unless some 'power' wanted them there. Of course the marketing myth is that we the people voted them in. But if the choice is limited amongst Clucking Tosspots any difference is no more than a whisp of irrelevence. But the mediocrity the Tosspots provide and practice is proving very dangerous to the welfare, wellbeing and future of our society.

contributed by John Souter


Richard said...

Thatcher, Blair and Kissinger mediocre? They may have been many things, but mediocre was not one of them.

Apogee said...

The problem is that all you can vote for is whatever rubbish ,or not, that the party puts up, the candidate is what the party wants, not you !
So why so surprised at the result?
As the saying in the computer world goes, garbage in, garbage out.
Apart from independents,and they are unknown quantities , thats yer lot.
So to repeat, why the surprise?
Some of you voted for them!

Crinkly & Ragged Arsed Philosophers said...

Richard - they were all mediocre in their democratic competence - the job we wanted them to do.

But as carpet baggers! I agree they were all major league.


Crinkly & Ragged Arsed Philosophers said...

Apogee - No surprise, just confirmation.

Woodsy42 said...

What a wonderful title!

subrosa said...

Aye Woodsy, Crinkly puts great effort into his titles and posts.

Related Posts with Thumbnails