Captain Ranty left a comment on my post regarding the 'Special Relationship'. He mentioned
this video which he has on his blog and I do feel it's worth viewing. I can say the 13th Article of Amendment is not noted in the current US Constitution and when I have more time I will research this further.
16 comments:
What happened to the Lehman Bros share of the US Federal Reserve?
Oh banned, you're asking a question to which I have no answer - not even a clue. Did hear something about Lehman Bros shares dropping earlier today though.
Subrosa. Lehmans went bust a couple of years ago so don't have any shares. It was Lehmans who started the collapse that all 'started in America' as McAvity keeps saying.
It might have been Goldman Sachs you read about.
A quick bit of research seems to show that the 13th ammendment was the one that banned slavery and nothing about titles of nobility.
Banned,
The 13th Amendment didn't actually ban slavery, at least, not in the way we were meant to think it did.
I have some links which explain why.
I'll post them later today.
CR.
RM, do you know I fell asleep last night realising what a stupid comment I'd made about Lehmans? Of course it was Goldman Sachs.
My apologies.
Auch banned, you put my searching to shame with your 'quick searches' - as always. Always a pleasure to hear you've found something.
I look forward to that CR.
This link has a ton of interesting information:
http://www.barefootsworld.net/real13th.html
I'll be back.
CR.
Another:
http://www.restoreliberty.com/involserv.htm
Or, if you like your info via YouTube, there is this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1v-Lq9oeXE
CR.
Many thanks CR. I know others are using your links too.
Rosa re your comment on Lehman's/Goldman Sachs, not so stupid.
Fact is is didn't matter either way which one took the fall. Note Rothchilds value and positions during the "crises."
I will do some research on that this evening RA. It's a horrible day here, cold, damp and miserable so no gardening this evening. Time then for having a look around on here.
I don't think it's any big secret that American domestic and foreign policy is shaped and written in the interests of the largest domestic centres of wealth and power in America ie big corporations. I think most people would be surprised if it wasn't.
Most of the top state bureaucrats also find jobs in the boardrooms of the top corporations - hence, this is just one of the reasons the US state has just bailed out the US financial sector from free-market bankrupcy using taxpayers money.
An American John Dewey once said something like, politics is the shadow cast on society by big buisness
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Dewey
The British monarchy could alsways try enacting their rights under the missing Amendment 13 of the US Constitution but I have a strange feeling they won't get very far.
In much the same way, the original owner-occupiers of the US, the First Nation Americans, can always try to recover their legal title to the property of ownership of America, which undoubtedly belongs to them as they are its undisputed first occupants, but I don't think they will get very far either.
Still, you never know.
Didn't the First Nation Americans Association try that not so long ago Joe yet got nowhere? It's ringing a bell somewhere.
Aye Dewey is right. The big money goes round the 3% of them. Us hoi polloi supply the money in the first place.
Post a Comment