Showing posts with label flood defences. Show all posts
Showing posts with label flood defences. Show all posts

Wednesday, 12 February 2014

An Avoidable Disaster


The above is a photograph of Burrowbridge in Somerset this week.

From the early 60s to the late 80s my parents could see the village of Burrowbridge from their living room window.  They lived little more than a mile away and my father walked the dog regularly along the River Parrett, which runs through Burrowbridge.  

Dad had done his homework before he built their house and ensured it was built on a hill - not a hill as we mean in Scotland, but more of an incline. Every winter the Parrett would overflow its banks and the road would be flooded but seldom closed.  The local farmers saw to that and, along with the pumping system which had been in place for generations, life continued happily while their friends back in Scotland usually battled snow and ice.

How things have changed. In less than 30 years the influential left-wing of UK government, in cahoots with the EU, decided butterflies and voles are more important than people. 

What has the EU to do with the maintenance of our waterways?  Everything.  How I wish the people of these islands would realise the EU has control over any government, be it Westminster or Edinburgh.  David Cameron and Alex Salmond bend over backwards to ensure every EU directive is implemented.  

I suspect the Somerset Levels qualified as no 11 in the EU Directive 2007/60/EC ‘Flood risks in certain areas within the Community could be considered not to be significant, for example in thinly populated or unpopulated areas’. Until the mid 90s, when many from the south east started to buy up west country homes as holiday homes, the counties of the south west were more or less ignored by London.  A little changed in the 90s (can’t afford to upset those wealthy enough to buy luxury holiday homes can we?) but not much.  The locals kept feet on the ground.

Speaking of ground, the soil on the levels is solid clay.  Even in dry heat of summer, it’s nearly impossible to dig to produce a garden of sorts.  Every alternate year my father had tons of top soil delivered because he was intent upon growing his beloved delphiniums and gladioli, but it was hard work.  The clay was unforgiving and refused to mix and the top soil was usually just spread over the flower beds.

The clay is the main reason why the water on the Levels refuses to be absorbed by the ground and the lack of trees also hinders the process.  

David Cameron, glib with soundbites as ever, insists there will be adequate money available for the flooding problem. although he refuses to acknowledge the problem is the cause of political decisions.  Now that the south east is also involved, I suspect the majority of any finance will be spent there and the people of the Levels will be left, not high and dry, but low and wet.

There is talk about reinstating the pumping stations of old and dredging the rivers, but over 12 months ago heard the same utterings. Nothing was done.

I’ve read some ‘greenies’ think the Levels should be left to revert to their ‘natural state’ before the Romans decided to reclaim the land for agriculture.  Sometimes I despair at the stupidity of these people.  The whole of the Fens was a bog, yet successive governments have ensured the area now is one of the UK’s most productive in terms of produce.

The flooding in the west country could have been easily avoided if politicians had listened to those ‘in the know’.  By that I don’t mean the Environment Agency, but the local people who, for generations, have dealt with the land.  Party leaders, welly-claded and murmuring platitudes, could be viewed as amusing, but the matter is far too serious.  

Will the present flood situation be the catalyst for a nationwide protest against our membership of the EU?  All I can do is hope.

Thursday, 12 July 2012

Another Stealth Tax


The Environment Secretary, Caroline Spelman, has disclosed she's in talks with the insurance industry about a scheme which could add 10% to a householder's home insurance policy, according to the Telegraph.

She's proposing the increase, which could be in place within months, in an effort to raise enough money to cover damage in the aftermath of severe flooding which can reach billions of pounds in insurance claims.

In certain areas of the UK thousands of homeowners affected by this summer's floods face higher premiums when they renew their annual home insurance policies and some have seen premiums rise by up to five times, while others have been told they must pay the first £5,000 of any future claim.

In 2000 a deal was struck between the then Labour government and the insurance industry to continue to cover the majority of customers living in areas prone to flooding in exchange for government promises to strengthen flood defences.  The deal is due to expire next year and no replacement scheme has yet to be finalised.

Ministers are concerned that some insurance companies are able to 'cherry pick' customers in low-risk areas and refuse to offer cover to home owners in flood-prone situations.

When I returned to live in Scotland I found a rather pleasant house in a village near my parents.  My father was ill with prostate cancer at the time and I thought being close to them would be of some help.  However, my father was emphatic that I should have nothing to do with the property and explained it had been built on a flood plain.  After doing a little research and even though the estate agent assured me no home on the small estate had ever been flooded, I took my Dad's advice and found a home further afield.  The estate agent's advice was worthless, because he omitted to add the houses were only  five years old.

I was fortunate in having advice from a 'local', but others were obviously not so lucky.  Only three years later the whole estate was flooded by the River Earn and the repair costs were well into the millions.  I heard many house owners were unable to insure their property again and one couple took radical steps and had their house lifted and placed on a three foot high base.  They knew if they tried to sell the property that they would lose thousands of pounds so thought it was worthwhile spending thousands ensuring it was safe from flood water.

But it's not the house owners who are to blame if the estate agent/solicitor who handles the purchase of their property doesn't inform them that their prospective home is at risk of flooding.  It's local authorities who are responsible.  Planning departments all over the UK are happy to give permission for developers to build on flood plains without ensuring they build strong flood defences prior to any property.

Why should every home owner be forced to pay for irresponsible councils?

Perth, a bonny city, had a long history of flooding caused by the River Tay. Many properties at the riverside are handsome, older buildings which over the years became more prone to flooding.  The reason was that the council planners were giving the go-ahead for more and more developments further upstream; thus unnaturally narrowing the river and once it entered the town it found easy outlets.  Less than 20 years ago Perth and Kinross undertook an expensive flood defence programme and since then there have been no problems with riverside properties flooding.

Shouldn't other councils be taking a leaf out of my local council's book and start dealing with their long-term flood problems rather than sitting back and expecting the insurance business, through policy holders, to pay?

Hebden Bridge in West Yorkshire was hit by rising flood damage twice in two weeks.  I know Hebden Bridge and it has been prone to flooding for years yet only now West Yorkshire council intend to do anything about it - but not quickly.  It will take six months for plans to be drawn up and taken to the regional flood defence committee to identify funding sources and possibly another couple of years or more before there is any chance of work beginning on the town's drainage system.

Meantime all householders will have a large increase in their premiums. Another stealth tax.

source
Related Posts with Thumbnails