Wednesday, 7 September 2011

Why Do Squatters Have 'Rights'?

'We've just moved in Yer Honour
Can our Wayne borrow the car tonight?'

I've never understood the term 'squatters rights'.  What right does anyone have to enter into someone's home without their permission?

Fortunately I've never had the sordid experience of trying to evict squatters from my property but I remember it happening to a work colleague many years ago.  She had only been married for a couple of years and they had spent all their spare cash lovingly refurbishing their two-up-two-down end of terrace in one of the London boroughs.  They'd won a weekend at a posh hotel as a raffle prize and because they hadn't had a holiday since their marriage, both were looking forward to the break.

On the Monday she telephoned to say she needed the day off to see to urgent personal matters and we were concerned.  Upon her return to work the next day she told us the horrific story.  Squatters had broken into their home during the weekend and refused to move out.  The police could no nothing she said and they were now living with his parents while they started the lengthy process of going to court to seek an eviction order. They spent thousands on legal fees and the stress caused her health problems.

When they finally managed to gain their home back the destruction was beyond belief and they had no strength left to begin again, so they sold the property and moved into rented accommodation. Whether they ever bought another house I don't know but, having witnessed first hand the mental damage squatters can do, I could understand if they decided never to buy a house again.

All these years later squatters appear to still have 'rights'.  They are criminals and should be treated as such.  Breaking and entering is a crime yet somehow squatters manage to evade that legislation.

The Westminster government is 'considering' changing the law to ensure squatting becomes a crime.  How many more people will have to endure the horror of finding their house occupied by a stranger before the politicians act?

Tuesday, 6 September 2011

Who Will Win The Poisoned Chalice?



While Alex Salmond basks in the glow of ex-Labour MSP Andy Kerr's compliments, I wonder if he will spare a thought for Tory MSP Murdo Fraser.

Murdo, the deputy leader of Scotland's tories, got his leadership campaign underway yesterday with his bid to dissolve the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party (SCUP) and create a new party built on "new unionism".  About 80 Tories attended the launch but the party's biggest single backer in Scotland, Sir Jack Harvie the transport tycoon, wasn't impressed in the slightest and has thrown his weight behind newly elected MSP Ruth Davidson.  Although Murdo is currently in the lead the odds have reduced today.

I think he's on the right track if the words Scottish Conservatives are not to be buried without ceremony but, try as I may I can't find anything of substance in Murdo's proposals other than a name change and that's a shame because I thought he had his finger on the pulse of disillusioned members.

The other contender, Jackson Carlaw, considers the proposal is 'dividing the party rather than uniting it.'  What he doesn't realise is that the party has been divided for years and requires a complete restructure.  Of course such rebuilds take time and it may be some years before former Tory voters, who now vote SNP, trust their natural party enough to support it.

If a complete restructure is rejected by the Tories then they will die a slow death here. If a rebuild is approved it will be some years before the Tories just may be able to become a major player.

Who will win the poisoned chalice?

M'Lords And The Scotland Bill


Today should be an interesting one for the supporters of Scottish independence because this afternoon Jim Wallace - Lord Wallace of Tankerness to his pals - will be introducing the second reading of the Scotland Bill in the House of Lords.

Slowly but surely support for independence is growing and the unionist parties are like fish out of water, gasping their last breaths with their same old mantras about how Scotland would be incapable of making her own decisions without the help of the Westminster government.

The feeble attempts in the last week, by the London-based Scottish secretary Michael Moore and Treasury secretary Danny Alexander, to attack the Scottish government have backfired badly and at one point, when watching Danny Alexander's speech, I very nearly felt sorry for him. I've heard better speeches from a first year debating group.

Today the former MSP George Foulkes, will put forward an amendment to the Scotland Bill to make the UK government call a referendum on Scottish independence by 2013, while Jack McConnell will call for unionist parties and businesses to come together to make the positive case for Scotland to remain in the UK.

Kick-off is 2.30pm and the fun can be watched on the BBC's Democracy Live. It may be worth recording it if you can't watch it live.

Monday, 5 September 2011

Good News



The 8,300ft cantilever Forth Bridge, the construction of which was started in the 1880s, introduced a famous idiom '... be like painting the Forth Bridge.'

The construction of an earlier bridge got as far as the laying of the foundation stone, but it was stopped because it was designed by Sir Thomas Bouch, who had designed the Tay Bridge which collapsed in 1879, causing the death of the 75 passengers on board. Bouch's reputation as an engineer was rightly ruined and the then owners Northern British Railway cancelled his contract and two Englishmen, Sir John Fowler and Sir Benjamin Baker, took over the project.

Bouch's design had proposed a suspension bridge whereas Sir John and Sir Benjamin had proposed a cantilever structure.

Until 1917 when the Quebec Bridge was completed, it was the longest cantilever bridge in the world.

When I was a child I journeyed over the Forth Bridge on many occasions - most of them very happy times when I'd been on family days out and I can remember wondering how the Forth Bridge painters managed to do their maintenance in high winds, freezing temperatures and on wet, wet days, but they did.

Now Network Rail, who manage the bridge have announced it will not need to be painted again for 25 years and that brings to an end the task in which teams of workers used to have to begin repainting as soon as they finished the last coat.

Over the years various paints have been trialled in an attempt to find one which could provide some longevity and at last one has been found. It is a specialist glass flake epoxy similar to that used in the offshore oil industry.

Stripping of the old layers of paint applied over the past 120 years has taken 10 years and cost £130 million.  Now it has been restored to its original condition and Network Rail say the new paint will preserve the steelworks for decades to come.

The bridge should be free of scaffolding by Christmas and it will be wonderful to view it from the road bridge without it.  However, my favourite sight of the bridge is when my plane circles over the Forth and shows the full glory of such a feat of engineering.  Then I know I'm home.

This news leaves me with a problem though. With what can I replace the idiom which I use reasonably regularly?

Scotland's Degree Courses



Universities are big business in the UK and globally. Selling the dream that an education will bring financial rewards beyond belief is a skill commonly shown by university PR departments and thousands of people fall for it.  The 'big' names have little need to advertise because their histories do the talking, but new universities have little or no history and require a more innovative marketing ploy.

Telford College in Edinburgh, founded in 1968 and not to be confused with Telford College, Oakengates, Shropshire, is offering cut-price honours degree courses.  Students who take a two year vocational HND qualification can upgrade to an honours degree after completing just one further year of study.

The course are also cheaper because the cost of an HND us much lower than a degree course, so students only have to pay higher fees for the final year of study.

Telford College will be tying up with Northumbria and Cumbria universities which would see courses developed in events and hospitality management, travel and tourism, creative industries and early learning. The shorter courses have been made possible under these partnerships with English universities - where a degree takes three years instead of four in Scotland.

Some years ago those who studied for an HND were either students who hadn't quite achieved good enough higher results to be admitted directly onto a degree course or those who had decided they preferred to enter the workplace and study for an HND in their own time.  Now HNDs are to be offered to all as they are cheaper.

This addresses an issue which should have been resolved some years ago.  Not all degree courses require full-time student attendance for four years. Some courses could quite easily be studied in three or even two years, but the higher education authorities refuse to debate this - possibly because they see their income radically reducing.  In England too their must be courses which could easily be condensed into two years rather than three.

I would like to think this system would be beneficial students, universities and the Scottish taxpayer but I am concerned about the value of the degree when its delivery appears to involve a fair amount of input from the English university system. It could be argued that is of no consequence because, for example, a degree in medicine from Dundee University can involve a period of on-job training in English hospitals.

Alastair Sim, director of Universities Scotland, which represents university principals, says 'already nearly one in 10 entrants to Scottish universities skip the first or second year having successfully completed an HND' so Telford College is not the first to provide 3 year degree courses but they are the first to associate them with English universities.

Will the achievement of a degree through the HND system be the way forward? Given the cost of a standard degree at an English university for a Scot, it could well be the answer. Will it encourage English students here?

I'm all for flexible learning and if this also keeps costs sensible it should be a winner, but our universities do need to face up to the fact that not only these few courses, but many others, could easily be reduced to three years. It's ludicrous that the likes of tourism and hospitality courses are currently programmed for the same length of study as the sciences and engineering - to name but a few.

If Switzerland can offer a globally recognised qualification in tourism and hospitality - through its excellent hotel schools - for one year of study, surely we should be looking to achieve such excellence for similar course and within a similar time frame.

source

Sunday, 4 September 2011

The Journeyman - The Epilogue


The Anniversary.

Neil Hopkins

Neil was unaware today was the anniversary of a decision that had threatened his dream. It was the first Saturday in May and he and Cecil were waiting for John and Gerald to arrive with a guest, having borrowed Bramshott while Huntington was honeymooning in the Maldives. Their guest was Geoff Smith, CEO of the National Bank who believed he was attending to discuss a whispered crisis on Uniclor’s ability to meet its loan commitments. He was, but whether a solution was offered to him or not depended on the position he adopted on the future of UK plc.

They had survived the drama of Boxing Day when, as nothing more than spectator, Neil had watched the services experts being briefed on their task then with the efficiency of well trained professionals effortlessly form into teams and select the gear needed. Honour, if it could be called that had prevailed; though as the ranking naval officer in charge commented as the first series of spheres were collected from Datchet’s surface and they’d relaxed enough to attempt to stamp warmth into their feet. “They might be complaining of having their leave rodgered, but if your bandits are happy with the money and the file is a master plan and not a bastard plan, there’s a fair chance they will appreciate the opportunity to rodger or be rodgered again.’
Nodding his agreement, Neil had pondered on the honesty of his thoughts in wishing the threat had been a hoax. Would he still have regarded the twenty million as money well spent? No question. Not only had it bought him the time to finalise the deal with Uniclor but the bastards in setting up the threat, had paradoxically gave credence with the authorities as to the response they as a group had adopted and the knowledge within the group of the tactics he’d used on Uniclor and the potential of Kalex hadn’t done his standing either with the authorities or the group any harm either. And, amusingly, the mixture of relief and gratitude had cut the final bill to ICP to less than a handful of millions and with careful handling would lead on to the profit of billions: but, for the moment, that was akin to sneaking out of the restaurant because you didn’t tip the waiter as much as you should have. He’d still been wrestling with his conscience when the khaki Land Rover came hurtling towards them. An army colonel gave them a smart salute and asked Neil if he’d mind excusing them. Told there was no need, he gave his report. It seemed Neil’s dichotomy had been resolved. The Colonel asked, ‘Shall we speed it up sir?’

Neil noticed the almost imperceptible twitch of the Admirals mouth before answering, ‘We’ll assume nothing.’ Then reaching inside his greatcoat, went on, ‘Since I see neither sun or yardarm, there’s no reason we can’t have a small celebration.’

Keeping Cecil out of it had been their quandary on Christmas day. A quandary partially resolved when they’d been warned of the location and duplicity of the green file and the location of the red. Neil would have collected it that day had it not been for Huntington’s witless fury at the news of Dellows disappearance. He’d half told the truth, explaining the green as a trap and with the reds location promised to be made known to them next day, before sinking to the fiction that Mrs Huntington had not been harmed and wouldn’t be, provided they stuck to the schedule. He excused the lie knowing they needed their wit not emotions, but did that excuse his lack of concern? Meanwhile John had been organising a chopper to take Gerald up to Scunthorpe where he’d be briefed by Cecil on the details of the trek then, if time and conditions allowed substituted for him while a weary Cecil would be flown home

The next day Neil had taken Huntington with him to collect the file, primarily to keep him in sight and under control. Later that night Cecil told them of the ‘governments’ conclusion. Secrecy it seemed had more purpose in the roles of deceit and saving of face than any other usage; need to know a poor second to the need to tell.

On the twenty-seventh Huntington and Dixon had been sent to Derby after an anxious sales rep reported a break in. Adding shock and murder four minutes later followed by a scream as Ruth, feeling fresh wet warmth tingling her loins, woke then struggled to get out a curse. Crises over, and with Ruth diligently substituting Gerald for Cecil, Neil persuaded himself his lack of concern was only real-pragmatik. Nothing could be done for the dead except for history to lie for them.

In John’s opinion Geoff Smith was as concerned as they were at the city’s sod’em and tomorrer attitude. The delusion that real wealth could be created by the computers speed to buy and sell invisible values, while material reality was gradually eased out of the programme; its truths, whatever their limitations, so deeply buried they no longer existed. Technology was a good servant but a cold whore if all its purpose was to profit the global greed of the few while the poor drifted down to the lowest global denominator.

Neil had smiled, any ‘ism was no more than a title for power. The American empire had built its strength on the fatigue of the old, and now it was being threatened by the re-emergence of even older empires. And survival would mean playing both at their own game. Hanging on to its coat tails might be real in politics but a slow death to any business. U.K.plc, had to be ruthless in creating its corporate structure. It had to select, adapt and speculate in all the emerging developments and technologies, treat history as a side show and, initially at least merge with U.S Corp as an equal. If it was, for now, to soar with the eagle it had to lift its eyes from the chicken shit of the past.

Smith would have to see and be committed, they’d already dead wood in the shape of Huntington and removing mediocrity from any equation still left two ways to go either in the air or in the shit. If Smith grabbed the gain with the least pain he’d be looking at a takeover by Midshire after the dust had settled when Californian and Berkley called in their Uniclor loans. Commitment to the longer term would see an ICP owned Uniclor marketing Kalex in the Americas and Smith heading a merged National and Midshire. Restraint by the monopoly or mergers no longer mattered now that the government had put itself on the market. It was now a commodity like any other, to be bought, sold or ignored, dependant on its value to the bidders and they didn’t include voters. Concern- that was either a conceit or an excuse and they couldn’t afford either.
**********************************

The Anniversary:

Brian Cameron.

The gull hovered, wings gracefully sweeping aside the demands of gravity while its honed instincts, ethereally demanded what it knew was its by right. I watched, delaying yet knowing I would give, and for my charity probably get a dollop of acidity proving the need for cows to fly had never existed.

Separating the soggy remnants of the bacon sandwich I threw them in opposite directions. Force the sod into making a decision. The gull did and scooped both, but it had only survival to contend with. Carried by the wind I heard the crack of the Pwhelli cannon announce the start of this year’s Dun Loaghaire race. Easing round I watched the kaleidoscope of spinnakers breaking out as the crews made the most of the southeasterly breeze. I allowed myself a smile, last year was a long way back and, I knew now, some things would never catch up.

I didn’t buy any of the yachts we’d arranged to inspect in January and in a couple of week’s time Rags and my divorce will be finalised. We did try. Tried perhaps too hard, and that’s not to say we didn’t enjoy the effort, especially after the Azores when she told me to cancel one of the rooms. Problem was I couldn’t lay it all on the line for her. Couldn’t explain how far up the ‘up’ was while we both knew how deep the down had been. If I’d told her the truth she’d have believed me, might even have admired me, then worried about every knock on every door. I’d have made her an accomplice; a criminal who had committed no crime other than believing a past life could be resurrected. Perhaps if I’d been less impatient, chanced another year before trying to get back together I could have concocted a story to explain my wealth. Wove the twists of luck into a fabric that obscured by pattern what it lacked in weave. Or maybe it was far more simple, more primal, the exposure to desperation. The desperation she’d seen when I was trying to save businesses and homes could still be sensed when she held me, or I her, when all I was desperate for was her.

Still, we’re friends, and that’s not a bad way for a couple to bring up their children. There’s no bickering between us on visits or finances and candidly it’s getting to the stage where Gemma and Stuart sort of schedule us in on their social calendar and there are times when we have a meal or day out as a foursome. Maybe that’ll change if Rag meets a bloke she wants to change things with, but I don’t see why it should.

Money? I’m not aware of any problems and, according to John Fernyhough, Pats got even less. Even the piddling amount we gave Slieghtholme was, on Johns advice, eventually invested in Uniclor stock before they shot up, sold just about peak, then into ICP stock along with a lot of our December earnings when they dived down. It seems, for the foreseeable future at any rate, we’ll be hitching our investments to Hopkins star. Which, if you think about it is, in an ironic way, sort of giving the money back so he can use it while we continue to gain from it. As a means of wealth distribution it’s got a lot more going for it than asset stripping. Anyway from what I’m told I’m over two point five million up (pre tax and on paper) since December so what’s to bother with.

I did buy a yacht, a forty-year-old classic that’ll take about a year before her original builder has her fully restored and updated and she’s moored alongside my home in Ireland. Why Ireland, well it’s a fresh start and for me it’s a country without the baggage of establishment or shame of a past empire that permeates the U.K. It was a decision that came to me when Pat and I had the weekend with John and Joanna towards the end of February and I was still struggling to come to terms with Rags decision. Ostensibly the purpose of the meeting was to bring Pat and me up to date on the investigations by the spooks and their masters. There was little to tell, other than the IRA had been awarded the role of prime suspect. Conjecture that forced Special Branch and MI5 to compromise their undercover ops and informers, enabling the IRA to take out most of them. Strange how often vanity can defeat intelligence. It all seemed remote and when John merely shrugged when I asked if he was bothered by it, we left it at that.

There was one bother I wanted out in the open. Telling them of the red file I saw a look of annoyance easing across Pats face while Joanna and John seemed, if anything, amused.
Pat asked, ‘What file did I leave on the plane?’
‘The red, but I rang them and told them where it was and not to use the green once I knew you were airborne.’
‘When the fuck did you decide on this?’ Pat glanced at Joanna. ‘Sorry.’
‘When everything was going pear shaped over the report. And before you get on your high horse I knew you had made arrangements as well.’
Pat shook his head, ‘Only to use Mike and have you quarantined. It was you that was going ape shit about something we could do nothing about.’
‘We could now.’
‘Christ Brian, how do we do that without it leading them right to us?’
‘Use Rebecca and Jane they’re the ones that had almost direct access to it. Rebecca’s already agreed and has started an analysis to accompany the report, one that explains the reasons and the consequences.’
Pat asked, ‘Why Jane?’
‘Rebecca hasn’t got the funds but Jane has. Say a couple of thousand copies from three different publishers distributed to MP’s, Universities, Media, Unions; wherever it can raise questions and blood pressure.’ I turned to John and Joanna, ‘You have any problem with that?’
Johns smile was almost benign. ‘Not exactly how we were hoping to use it Brian, but since you or Rebecca obviously have copies we’re hardly in a position to prevent you. Though I have to ask you to do us a favour and delay its publication and I’d suggest you chose publishers outside the UK. That apart Joanna and I have also a confession to make and since she was the instigator I’ll hide behind her skirts and let her tell you.’
The smile Joanna gave Pat and me would, had John not been there, been downright inviting. ‘I got the idea from something you told John when you explained the job you did in Yorkshire. You see we were also concerned about the wedge the report had driven between us. On the one hand your suspicions Brian were quite correct, it would, or rather will, be used as a leverage tool in the cesspit of political manoeuvres.’
Sensing I was about to interrupt John took over. ‘If I can explain Brian. In that role it has terrific potential but very specific limitations in as much as it can only be used once and to maximise its leverage it must be used covertly. Once it’s out in the open the damage is done and it becomes an exercise of denial and damage limitation. We haven’t used it yet because we don’t want to sell it cheap.’
I nodded, ‘Okay, I can see the sense in that, but for how long John?’
‘Give us six months and, if it’s used sooner I’ll tell you.’
The look of relief on Pats face told me I’d still some way to go in convincing him. I’d already covered that by suggesting to Rebecca she approach Jane direct; now all I had to do was rein Rebecca in. No easy task but such are the rewards of deviousness amongst friends.
Having won his point John handed their ‘confession’ back to Joanna.

‘Pat was quite right when he said you could do nothing about it at the time other than use it as we did. After all it doubled our returns, gave us an insight into a unique and previously unknown club of powerful businessmen and, hopefully, one we will continue to profit from them.’

Joanna I’m aware of all that and I’m not proud of the stunt I pulled with the files, so what’s this all about?’
‘The files Brian, they didn’t matter.’
‘What! How?’
‘The detonators we supplied were all duds.’ Joanna reached over and put her hand on my arm. ‘ We were worried enough about the chemical and we knew you would dream up something. It was all we could think of that covered all the bases without causing further arguments. Sorry Brian.’
‘Don’t be, it was me that was being the pillock, Pat?’
‘I agree, you were being a pillock but tell me John, did Mike know?’
John shrugged,‘If we ever meet Mike, that’ll be the first time.’

The strangulated phut of the tenders’ diesel brought me back to the present. Catching the bags that were thrown at me I dropped them down below before stretching out my hand to welcome a grinning Mike aboard. Pat and John suffered the penalty of familiarity and were left to look after themselves. We’d allowed ten days to cruise easy up to Gometra in the Inner Hebrides before meeting up with the girls. Did I tell you I bought this house on the island for Rag, she wouldn’t be there; too busy with the boutique, but Rebecca, Joanna and Jane would. Ten days should give us enough time to rough out the groundwork for our next scheme and this time it was Pat who was the instigator. After Jane and him had spent two months in Dominica and witnessed poverty beyond belief while the bastions of free trade undermined its capability to find a viable market for its crop.

Seemingly in the worlds stronghold of rampant technology and commerce there’s a breed of insect that had it beat. From time immemorial this mite has pruned the arboreal forests of North America. Appearing in one area one year, it would be gone the next. Except for New Brunswick; there the foresters decided some years back to D.D.T. the pest out of existence. They’d failed and plastic nature took its revenge by increasing its demand. From a ten yearly cycle exacting little more than a one percent toll she changed to a yearly demand and almost ten percent toll on two hundred million acres of forest. It wasn’t the mite being avaricious, it was merely fighting to maintain its existence against a chemical holocaust; it didn’t even know it was winning.

Commercially sugar beet is of little interest to North America, less then three percent of the yearly revenue of soft and hardwoods. Man decided to use technical brain where chemical brawn had failed and set about planting beet in forest clearings. Then by dowsing the trees but leaving the beet clean they indoctrinated the mites into believing beet not buds was their true diet. Our scheme was to place shipping containers filled with beet in these clearings. Containers that, when suitably infected, would be shipped to the lesser Mediterranean ports before being distributed throughout Europe and the USSR.

Of course our motives weren’t entirely altruistic. It would be foolish not to have some discreet investments in carefully selected sugar futures. Could be they’d result in some very sweet dividends for us, and indirectly of course, the Dominicans. And, of course I wanted a quiet word with Mike.

So as yet I’ve only learnt how to fight the system. Real success is when you can afford to ignore it. So for now I’m at the level of journeyman.

The End
© Eoin Taylor

Solar Panels On The Wane



One of America's largest solar panel manufacturers, Solyndra Inc., is filing for bankruptcy and laying off more than 1000 employees.

Last year President Obama visited the Freemont plant and praised the company for their energy-saving manufacturing and he attempted to acquire a government loan for them to stay afloat.  That backfired because lawmakers called Obama's decision to support the company as "a dubious investment".

Solyndra Inc blames their problems on foreign competition which is creating products with prices that they can't compete against.  They also say that 'a slowing demand for solar panels coupled with a global market' has rendered them unable to continue.

Financial analyst Adam Krop adds:

“I don’t see anyone swooping in,” says the analyst from Ardour Capitol Partner in New York. “I don’t see this technology as very viable in the long-term."

Two other large American-based solar power manufacturers also called quits in August.

It would appear heavy competition from Chinese manufacturers has caused the price of solar panels to drop nearly 50% in 2011, yet companies here is the UK are still selling them at 2010 prices - with some increasing the cost.

Most, if not all, of the UK's solar panels are manufactured abroad and UK companies which promote them are "middle men"; thus increasing the price to the consumer some £x fold.  Now that it's been openly stated that prices have decreased 50% in the US this year has there been any reduction in the final price to consumers?  No.

Why not? Because I agree with Mr Krop.  Solar panels are not viable in the long term.  I've a friend who installed them on her house two years ago and has already spent a considerable amount of money having them cleaned.  More than her 'pay-back' fee by far she says. The cleaning of these panels involves scaffolding because nowadays nobody will go on a roof without a harness and scaffolding.  Plus this non-existent Scottish summer hasn't produced the power she was told by the salesman.

I don't blame her for trying, because she has a small holding in a very open area and she is a carbon emissions believer, yet she has donated nothing to the Grid since her system was installed so therefore she has had no income. Also she has, this 'summer' on many occasions to use her boiler to heat her home later in the day.  Fortunately, or unfortunately whichever way you look at it, she has friends who do have knowledge of solar technology and she was well warned that its installation could prove to be a liability but she likes to think she's part of the green community.

Usually what happens in America happens here and if the demand there has so dramatically reduced then...


Saturday, 3 September 2011

We're Quite Unforgiving



Goodness me, surely Samantha Cameron has enough 'contacts' to know what to wear to the Braemar Games. An ill-fitting trouser suit didn't go down at all well with the people I know attended.

"For special occasions we wear skirts," said one female observer and another said her choice was, "typically out of touch with us Scots."

Today it was the highlight in the Highland Games calendar.The final games take place in Blairgowrie tomorrow when many of today's participants take part enroute to their homes. Thankfully the weather dried up by lunchtime today and a good time was had by all.

As for Mrs Cameron: time to change your designer Samantha if you wish to gain some fashion sense. From the knowledgeable ladies of Perthshire and beyond.

We're quite unforgiving.

Take Your Pick



Inside Gaddafi's secret underworld (video)

Just A Common Soldier

Neil Lennon Verdict - Why Bother Having a Trial?

Does this put YouGov's daily movements into context?

The astonishing ignorance of people who believe the official 9/11 story

This Sceptic Isle (video)

A history of England

Nicola Sturgeon: "same sex marriage should be introduced..."

The Choices We Make

Still time to save the [English] NHS?



Friday, 2 September 2011

Stop Recording Our Children


It never ceases to surprise me how many people are affronted at this post, yet are happy for all children to be digitally fingerprinted every day they attend school.

Locally, the new school campus has this equipment and when I questioned the janitor about its effectiveness in recording attendances, he muttered something about breakdowns and lots of computer input.


Some months ago I wrote about how schools may be breaking EU law using biometric fingerprints for pupils, but nothing has been heard from those who protested.  Now a stronger group in England has joined with other organisations and campaigned in London yesterday to decided how they should take on a government which has not only ignored the issue of taking pupils' fingerprints, but has allowed them to pay for the fingerprint systems using e-Learning credits.

Scottish parents don't seem to mind if their children are fingerprinted daily without their knowledge and their fingerprints are added to a database.

This issue can't be allowed to be a nine-day wonder. Parents must be given the choice as to whether their children's fingerprints are forever recorded on a government database.

Good luck to those in England who are doing their utmost to highlight the matter.  I would much prefer teachers to return to the daily paper record system of physically marking attendance first thing every morning (and these days afternoon too).  That is also a teacher-pupil interaction for those who like to tick boxes.

Task Completed



On Tuesday evening the people of Wootton Bassett in Wiltshire held a short ceremony to mark the end of military repatriations through their small community.

Thursday, 1 September 2011

Happy Birthday Courtesy Of The Taxpayer



Earlier today I drove past Perth prison and was reminded of this.

Am I alone in thinking our prison system is making a mockery of those who are the victims of people convicted of crime?

I do believe there are many people within the prison system who should not be there because they have problems, for which we as a society are responsible and we ought to ensure they receive appropriate treatment or support, but Perth prison is one of Scotland's 'heavy duty' goals, although it now also houses male prisoners serving sentences under 4 years.

But is a prison an environment in which the prison service - a taxpayer funded security service - should encourage birthday parties involving young children? If the Express reporting is to be believed (and I've no good reason to doubt it), then birthday parties take place in private visiting rooms - complete with cake, balloons, presents and songs.

Perth prison is not the only prison in Scotland to provide for such events. The CEO of the Scottish Prison Service:

'All prisons have taken steps to entertain children who are visiting their parents behind bars include toys, books, TVs, game consoles and soft play areas.'

He also revealed that Perth, Polmont and Kilmarnock prisons have party facilities while others can host events in family bonding rooms.

This is one of the times I think my knowledge of social science is severely wanting. Hard working people pay for this while the victims of crime are left isolated. Are birthday parties in prison environments educational?

Never mind though - it's all for the sake of the children. Aye.

Today's Non-Story


Paul McBride QC is no shrinking violet - quite the contrary. As one of Scotland's most outspoken unionist lawyers, having once been a vocal member of the Scottish Labour party but defected to the Scottish Tories in 2009, he enjoys the limelight and the attention he receives in the Scottish MSM.

The QC is a fan of Celtic FC and has represented them on several occasions. It is also reported he is currently representing Andy Coulson in the ongoing investigation into phone hacking.

A busy man by all accounts is Mr McBride, yet he's found time to add his support to George Galloway's latest entry into the literary world with his publication Open Season: The Neil Lennon Story.  Being a typical unionist Mr McBride couldn't resist having a dig at the SNP, but his effort was a disgrace to all self-respecting Scots, regardless of their religious beliefs.

Mr McBride... warned of possible damage to "social cohesion and related matters" if voters backed independence in a referendum.


To imply sectarianism would increase in an independent Scotland is not only foolish - he has no evidence - but totally irresponsible from a person of his professional standing. His opinion is so blatantly absurd it deserves to be labelled a non-story.

source

Related Posts with Thumbnails