Saturday, 7 March 2009

TWEETS of the WEEK


Tweets of the Week


stephenfry In the meantime I'm childishly amused by waiter who's just told me about promotion: in his accent "two vodkas and you get a turd free"  (from somewhere on the western edge of South America)


mattwardman@scots_subrosa I'm still playing with different Twitter clients.


JamesKellyLabour PPB : "Inspiring, engaging." Who could she be talking about? IAIN GRAY? Now I know the true definition of a 'tough sell'. (I didn't see the PPB but here's what Dizzy Thinks says)



SUBROSA'S SUPER SEVEN Blogs




the reality of life in Bagdad
the bailout of the PFI industry
a message to voters in England from a Scottish nationalist
the muslim campaign to free Lord Ahmed (it's not a joke)
Glenrothes election enquiry (please scroll down as direct link unavailable)
Back to a mickey mouse Parliament?
talking Brown

Anstruther Fish Suppers to:
the preservation of Leith or people power
The wonderful web presence of Woolworths
the return of morality by a labour MP

Friday, 6 March 2009

THE GUILT BUNCH



No, the headline isn't a typing error it's a description of the photograph. Like many women I've received a few 'guilt bunches' over the years and this is the latest.  Most families have dates in the year which are important only to them and they mark the events in their own way.  There was one in my family last Sunday so I duly made the card and bought a golfing jumper , but what I didn't do was drop any hints as to what I'd like and I managed not to even mention it. Wasn't easy to keep quiet but I did want to discover if the date would be remembered by the other party.

Sunday morning I produced the prettily wrapped parcel accompanied by an equally pretty card and the look of embarrassment told me what I wanted to know.  "Why didn't you remind me?" was the guilty question and of course the standard reply was, "I thought you'd remember."
Being a Sunday the only shops open were a couple of supermarkets but I still did rather well didn't I - my favourite colours too.  Doubt if the date will be forgotten again.  I  live in hope.
 
THE GUILTY BUNCH for me this week would be the labour, tory, and libdems who all voted against the proposal for the Referendum Bill on Thursday evening.  During the debate earlier in the day calls for the SNP to drop the proposal came from all sides but Alex Salmond wasn't shaken, in fact he didn't appear to even be slightly stirred.  The opposition are between a rock and a hard place on this one because they know their No vote could be advantageous to the SNP as they could use it to tell the electorate that the 'againsts' don't want them to have a say in their own future.

The libdem amendment stating it should be dropped owing to the present economic climate wasn't a particularly clever move.  It could be argued that this very situation has created a perfect opportunity for the country to gain full powers and start to build a Scotland for the people who live in it.

No matter what the next couple of years bring, they certainly won't be boring.

Thursday, 5 March 2009

FMQs 5 March 2009


Once the concierge of Parliament's garden lobby (Brian Taylor of the BBC) had introduced this week's FMQs and Iain Gray had asked his first question, it was obvious that this would be one of the more serious FMQs. Iain Gray's continual request for the withdrawal of the Independence Bill met a strong rebuttal from Alex Salmond and, now we know that today's vote has gone against (no surprise there), I somehow feel labour have shot themselves in the foot.  Alex Salmond was able to quote some, and there were many, labour party quotes from their officials when they did support a referendum since the SNP were the government.

Annabelle Goldie and Tavish Scott both used the occasion to bring the horrific death of the toddler Brendon to the attention of the country and asked what the Scottish government was going to do about ensuring such children were better protected.  Alex Salmond explained the guilt lay with the person who committed the crime and the Parliament should not make judgements before the various enquiries have reported. He supported the child protection system in Scotland and the relevant agencies such as social work, police and health personnel.

No points were scored today by any opposition party who declined to offer suggestions to hastening the improvement for the people of Scotland in the current economic climate, but if I'm allowed a personal comment, I do wish Iain Gray would take some public speaking courses at night school.  The few times I've heard Cathy Jamieson speak she  was capable, on occasion, of having Alex Salmond stutter, not a lot, but stutter just the same.  Of course she wasn't Gordon Brown's choice and too much of her support came from the unions.

SMART THINKING from the TORIES


After PMQs today William Hague did this video analysis of his part then it was put up on YouTube to maximise the message.  Good idea and should be adopted by others.

Courtesy of PlayPolitic


IS SCOTLAND RACIST?

Wrinkled Weasel has a post on his blog entitled 'Scottish Racism'. I found most of it sad and a little of it offensive, in particular the accusation that the whole of Scotland is racist. In this context I find the word racist is used more for emotive purposes than to discuss any underlying tensions between the English and the Scots.  He makes a reference to the young woman Lucy Newman who was attacked recently in Aberdeen and it was reported the reason was because she was English.  I do not condone any form of violence and I was disgusted to think that a stranger would attack another for any reason, but, when the picture widened and Lucy seemingly had lived in Scotland since she was 4 (she was 17 at the time of the assault), how could she have a strong English accent?  Surely if she'd been educated in a Scottish school with Scots dialects all around she couldn't have held onto an strong English accent.  Also there must have been some dialogue between the aggressor and herself but no detail was given.  It can be easy, in any situation, to use the 'racist' card.  No matter, the abuse of the young woman was Scotland's shame regardless of its motive. 

'I had a low level dispute with someone in Port Seton, which is less than seven miles from where I have lived for the past six years. I was sitting down to enjoy my fish supper, along with other people, on the quayside, when the woman and her daughter on the next seat began feeding the seagulls. They starting swooping and it looked as though I was going to lose my lunch or get it pooped on. So I said, “Do you mind not doing that?” and explained why. Now, you could argue that she should have ignored me, or just told me to feck off. But no, she said, and I quote, “We live here”.'

'The most regular, and mild, and yet most irritating is “Are you on holiday?” Sounds mild enough, but ask that of a black person or a third generation Pakistani and you are on very thin ice.'

Can the above two statements be classed as racist?  I think not. The scenarios could happen anywhere in the UK and beyond. The latter one is rather amusing.; perhaps he's not asked the same question when in England because nobody is interested.  Scots can be nosy but their nosiness is generally not a negative action, it is more of a genuine interest in my opinion.

Many of us now find we are reluctant to open our mouths in public. I don’t mean among the educated classes, I mean in public, among the hoi-polloi and the shopkeepers and low level council officials.

Now this statement is far more concerning as it implies the 'educated' are in some way superior and therefore have no negative thoughts about English people living here and that is nonsense. Not only does it insult our population it is this attitude which creates tensions which, in his view, only the 'great unwashed' harbour.  He also exposes the fact that the English perspective of class is alive and well.  Let me relate a couple of incidents which happened to me during my many years in England (aside from the very regular taunts of being called Jock, being asked why I didn't wear a kilt and the oh so constant 'Auk aye the noo' nonsense).

When attending an event in Sandhurst some years ago, I happened to overhear a very senior officer discussing a young trainee with his colleagues.  I knew this young man was a Scot and the conversation was along the lines of,  "I told him he'd make an excellent officer but he'll never be a ***** gentleman with an accent like that".  As I found this astonishing from such a high ranking military person, who I actually liked, I moved into the group to show my presence. His attempt to cover his embarrassment was amusing as well as pathetic and he wittered on about 'just a joke' etc.  I decided to keep silent.  That was, in my opinion, more humiliating for him than any words I could utter.

The second incident was at a drinks and winks 'do' after a board meeting of a large voluntary organisation.  The chair was a peer of the realm and also a local landowner, a true English gentleman by all accounts.  During the soiree he approached me and said, "I didn't realise they produced people of such intelligence in that primitive land of yours".  How I remember these words and the feelings they produced. His lordship obviously thought he was complimenting me but I thought otherwise.  I resigned within days, but to my shame I did not give the true reason; something I've regretted since.

None of my experiences would I class as racism, just ignorance.  I do realise many Scots have an inferiority complex and it has been borne from years of domination by the larger country of England.  To accuse Scotland of being 'racist' without admitting anti-Scottish tensions exist in England is inequitable.

Accents convey a culture.  Some may lose their accents because they leave a country when young but most seem to be fiercely proud of their roots, such as American Italians and Canadian Scots.  The Luxemburgers, Dutch and Belgiums feel squashed by the Germans and French and make derisory comments about each other.  Tensions exist but I certainly wouldn't call the countries of Luxemburg, the Netherlands or Belguim racist. Cultures differ and human nature demands we preserve ourselves in order to survive.

Perhaps I'm fortunate living where I do as there is very little evidence of anti-English tension. It is well documented that the west of Scotland suffers more, particularly in certain areas of sport.  To say that the government holds the answer is too simple, the answer lies in understanding each other's attitudes - a far more complex exercise and one, if Wrinkled Weasel is to be believed, which can only be understood by the 'educated'.

Wednesday, 4 March 2009

CRAIG MURRAY'S APPEAL FOR HELP




As my regular readers know I seldom quote other blogs without comment.  This post from Craig Murray requires no comment apart from the fact that we are a democracy and each citizen is entitled to freedom of speech.  It starts:

'March 4, 2009

Your Help Needed - Reveal Torture to Stop It

On Tuesday 10 March the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights will discuss whether or not to hear my evidence on the UK government's policy of using intelligence from torture. They discussed whether to hear my evidence on 3 March but failed to reach a conclusion.

The government is lobbying hard for my exclusion. I need everybody to send an email to jchr@parliament.uk to urge that I should be allowed to give evidence. Just a one-liner would be fine. If you are able to add some comment on the import of my evidence, or indicate that you have heard me speak or read my work, that may help. Please copy your email to craigjmurray@tiscali.co.uk.

Please also pass on this plea to anyone you can and urge them to act. Help from other bloggers in posting this appeal would be much appreciated.' 

'I was British Ambassador in Uzbekistan from 2002 to 2004. '

The remainder of the post outlines the key points he wishes to make.  Do consider sending an email to jchr@parliament.uk.
Note:  This post is not because I necessarily agree with Craig's opinions but I do believe in British citizens having rights.

Tuesday, 3 March 2009

PUFF GORDON


Photo: Courtesy of the Telegraph

I really can't believe it!  Doesn't our Prime Minister know you get a much better finish if you apply your own powder.  Puffs are a bit dated too these days, most powder wearers use a brush.

Wonder if his lady make-up artist used concealer first and then a dod of foundation before puffing the face of Britishness.  I expect she had to because she wasn't gilding any lily was she.

MILLIBAND'S JOB TRAINING COSTS



Tucked away in the Scotsman today is the headline '£7,000 to 'train' Millband'.  Taxpayers have paid £6,700 for the Foreign Secretary to be coached 'on the presentation of foreign policy issues'.

Mr Millband, who writes a regular blog on the Foreign Office website, also received £85 worth of IT training courtesy of the taxpayer.

It's a pathetic testimony to the abilities of labour party politicians when one of them has to be given this amount of training in presentation skills to do their job. What makes presenting foreign policy issues any different to presenting an advertisement for a new fruit juice?  Nothing, the process is the same.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for progressive training in the workplace and I'm aware it is essential to many businesses, but presentation skills are usually learned long before someone becomes our representative in foreign policy throughout the world.  It may be that the labour party doesn't 'do' presentation skills and uses outside agencies, paid for with other people's hard earned cash, who knows.

A pensioner on the basic state pension currently receives  £4,716.40 a year (£90.70 a week) and a couple receive £7,542.60 a year (£145.05 a week).  A couple have to live for a year on just slightly more than it cost to educate this man in a basic business skill.  Puts it in perspective a little doesn't it.

Note:  Of course there's always pension credit for anyone on the basic pension, that is if they can bear the humiliation of the application process. 

Monday, 2 March 2009

AN EXTRA TREASURY BENEFIT OF ROYAL MAIL PRIVATISATION



Over the past week or so there's been much written and spoken about Peter Mandelson's determination to privatise part of the Royal Mail.

In the letters page of the Dundee Courier, a letter from David McNicoll of the Carnousie Golf Shop caught my eye.  I'm sure he won't mind me quoting it.

Sir,—Many members of the public may not be aware Royal Mail services are exempt from VAT.

If the part privatisation goes ahead the company which owns it will be subject to the tax and therefore Mr Brown’s government will receive a substantial income on the turnover.

Is this the real reason why the government wants support for the proposal? I have not yet heard this mentioned from any commentators.

Obviously there is only one person who pays the VAT at the end of the day and that’s the end-user . . . you. Stand by for a 15% hike in postal costs.'

I never realised VAT would have to be paid by the purchaser, did you?  So the government get the best of both worlds with this sell off, they receive the purchase price then quarterly VAT contributions.  No mention has been made about the price the purchaser will pay but somehow they must think it's cheap or they wouldn't be touching it with a barge pole.  There's more to this than meets the eye and it's not only the fact that labour have broken a manifesto commitment in which they assured the electorate the Royal Mail would be kept in public ownership, but a pledge they made last year to the unions.

Sunday, 1 March 2009

SELF PORTRAIT



This is a reasonable likeness although I wish I could have chosen the lipstick colour; red is so last year.  For some mindless fun have a go here.  Enjoy!
  
Courtesy of Daniel1979
Related Posts with Thumbnails